[2018] KEHC 660 (KLR)
The court found that the application for leave to appeal out of time was filed within a reasonable period after judgment and that no prejudice was demonstrated by the respondents as a result of the delay. The court also considered that if execution were to proceed and the appeal succeeded, it would result in further...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 660 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Redcross Headquarters; Applicant: Abdulaziz Ismael; Respondent: Wilson Odhiambo Ong’ale; Respondent: Nerea Shikuku Andabwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 397 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application allowed with conditions.
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Exercise of Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Redcross Headquarters
Applicant
Abdulaziz Ismael
Applicant
Wilson Odhiambo Ong’ale
Respondent
Nerea Shikuku Andabwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether a stay of execution of the lower court judgment should be granted pending appeal.
- 3 What conditions, if any, should be imposed for the grant of stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for leave to appeal out of time was filed within a reasonable period after judgment and that no prejudice was demonstrated by the respondents as a result of the delay. The court also considered that if execution were to proceed and the appeal succeeded, it would result in further litigation to recover the sums paid. The court exercised its discretion to grant both leave to appeal out of time and a stay of execution, subject to the condition that the entire decretal sum be deposited in an interest-earning account in the names of both advocates within 30 days. This approach balanced the rights of both parties and ensured that neither would suffer undue...
Court Disposition
Application allowed with conditions.
Orders
- Leave granted to the applicants to file the appeal within 30 days from the date of this ruling.
- Stay of execution of the lower court judgment granted pending determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION 397 OF 2018
KENYA REDCROSS HEADQUATERS ....................................................................1ST APPLICANT
ABDULAZIZ ISMAEL ...............................................................................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
WILSON ODHIAMBO ONG’ALE & NEREA SHIKUKU ANDABWA
(Suing as the administrators of the Estate of PHELESIA ACHIENG-Deceased ....RESPONDENTS
RULING
By an application dated 13th July, 2018 the applicants seek orders to be allowed to lodge an appeal out of time, and that there be a stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the lower court delivered on 18th April, 2018. The grounds for seeking those orders are set out on the face of the application and the supporting affidavit sworn by the legal officer of CIC General Insurance Limited which had insured the applicants.
The application is opposed and there is a replying affidavit sworn by the respondents herein. Parties have filed their respective submissions which I have on record. The orders sought are discretionary which discretion is required to be exercised judicially.
The foundation of the orders sought is to be found in Order 42 Rules 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules which is among the provisions of law cited by the applicants.
The applicants have the right of appeal while the respondents have a judgment in their favour. The court is supposed to balance the rights of the parties in addressing applications of this nature. Any prejudice to the respective parties should be avoided. The lower court suit was filed in the year 2016 and the determination made in April, 2018. By any standards this suit has been heard and determined expeditiously.
The application was filed about 3 months from the date of the judgment but it will be evident from the record that whatever transpired thereafter was done expeditiously. In any case, no prejudice has been alleged has been occasioned by the filing of the application three months after the original judgment. In the event this judgment is executed and the appeal succeeds, there will be yet another round of litigation to recover the money so paid or any part thereof. I must also bear in mind the contemplated grounds of appeal which appear in the draft Memorandum of Appeal attached to the application.
Doing the best I can in the circumstances of the case, I allow the application and grant leave to the applicants to file the appeal within 30 days from the date of this ruling. There shall also be a stay of execution of the lower court judgment as prayed pending the determination of the appeal. However, that is on condition that the entire decretal sum is deposited in an interest earning account in the names of both advocates on record within the same period of 30 days. The costs hereof shall be on appeal.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 18th day of December, 2018.
A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE