[2013] KEELRC 446 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 446 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to pay the grievants their terminal dues as agreed in the memorandum of agreement and as computed by the claimant. The respondent did not provide any evidence of payment or challenge the detailed computation submitted by the claimant. The court held that the bare denial by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 446 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Scientific, Research International, Technical & Allied Institutions Workers’ Union; Respondent: Kenya Sugar Research Foundation
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 191N of 2009
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Final Award
Outcome
Claim allowed. Computation of terminal dues as filed by the claimant adopted as the order of the court. Each party to bear its own costs.
Legal Topics
Retrenchment Benefits, Terminal Dues, Notice Pay, Accrued Leave, Severance Pay, Overtime Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Retrenchment Benefits Terminal Dues Notice Pay Accrued Leave Severance Pay Overtime Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 38
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Scientific, Research International, Technical & Allied Institutions Workers’ Union

Applicant

Kenya Sugar Research Foundation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Final Award

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to pay the grievants their terminal dues upon retrenchment.
  2. 2 Whether the computation of terminal benefits as filed by the claimant should be adopted by the court.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is liable for notice pay, accrued leave, severance pay, and overtime for the grievants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to pay the grievants their terminal dues as agreed in the memorandum of agreement and as computed by the claimant. The respondent did not provide any evidence of payment or challenge the detailed computation submitted by the claimant. The court held that the bare denial by the respondent was insufficient and, on the balance of probabilities, the respondent was liable to pay the terminal benefits as claimed. The computation filed by the claimant was adopted as the order of the court, entitling each grievant to the specific amounts listed. The issue of deceased grievants was deemed rectifiable before execution and did not affect the substantive...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Computation of terminal dues as filed by the claimant adopted as the order of the court. Each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the 38 grievants the terminal dues as computed in Appendix XIV to the Statement of Claim, with specific amounts listed for each grievant.
  • Each party to bear their own costs.