[2004] KEHC 1312 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proven its claim for the overpaid sum of Kshs.2,529,629.00 due to the defendant's improper debiting of interest and failure to credit payments in a timely manner. However, the plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to general damages, as the only loss established was the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1312 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kenya Shoe Company Limited; Defendant: Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 102 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of Kshs.2,529,629.00 plus interest at court rates and costs; claim for general damages dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Bank Customer Relationship, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Accounting, Interest on Judgment Debt
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Shoe Company Limited
Plaintiff
Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant breached the bank/client relationship by wrongfully debiting the plaintiff's account with excessive and illegal interest amounts.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for the alleged breach and fraud.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest at commercial bank rates or only at court rates.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proven its claim for the overpaid sum of Kshs.2,529,629.00 due to the defendant's improper debiting of interest and failure to credit payments in a timely manner. However, the plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to general damages, as the only loss established was the overpayment already covered by the liquidated claim. The court also held that interest at commercial bank rates was not justified in the absence of a contractual basis, limiting the plaintiff to interest at court rates. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the plaintiff for the liquidated sum with interest at court rates and costs.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of Kshs.2,529,629.00 plus interest at court rates and costs; claim for general damages dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff for Kshs.2,529,629.00.
- Interest awarded at court rates from the date of filing suit until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANI
CIVIL CASE NO.102 OF 2004
KENYA SHOE COMPANY LIMITED…………….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED….….DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff herein, KENYA SHOE COMPANY LIMITED , sought in its plaint dated 20th February 2004 judgment against the Defendant, KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, as follows –
(a) Kshs.2,529,629. 20.
(b) General Damages.
(c) Interest at commercial bank rates from date of filing suit until payment in f ull.
(d) Costs of the suit.
The Plaintiff’s action is based on alleged breach by the Defendant of the bank/client relationship between them, particulars whereof are given in the plaint. The Plaintiff has also pleaded fraud and given particulars. As a result of the breaches and fraud, the Plaintiff further pleads, its account with the Defendant was wrongfully debited with excessive and illegal amounts of interest amounting to Kshs.2,529,629. 20 as at 31st August 2002. Further, the Plaintiff was compelled to sell its properties charged to the Defendant on a forced-sale basis and at an undervalue, and thereby suffered loss and damage.
The Defendant was duly served with summons to enter appearance but neither entered appearance nor filed defence. Interlocutory judgment for the sum of Kshs.2,529,629. 20 was entered against it on 13th April 2004. On 15th July 2004 I heard the Plaintiff’s case exparte in respect to the claim for general damages. The Plaintiff called one witness,JOSEPH KAMAU NGUGI , who is its director. The testimony of this witness is that the Defendant failed to calculate properly the amount due and owing to it from the Plaintiff and further failed to provide the Plaintiff with statements of account. He further testified that a certain payment by the Plaintiff of Kshs.3,903,000. 00 made to the Defendant on 11th September 1995 was not credited until 1st March 1996. Had it been credited in time the outstanding balance would have been far less. As a result of all the above, the witness further said, the amount demanded by the Defendant was overstated, and because of it the Plaintiff was forced to sell its factory for only Kshs.7,000,000. 00 whereas it was worth Kshs.10,000,000. 00. No valuation report was produced.
But more importantly, the witness acknowledged that at the time the factory was sold the Plaintiff indeed owed money to the Defendant that it had been unable to pay and that therefore the factory had to be sold in order to pay off its indebtedness to the Defendant. Furthermore, the Defendant, rather than realize its debenture itself, allowed the Plaintiff to sell the factory by private treaty. In these circumstances, no general loss or damage is proved, and the claim for general damages cannot succeed. The only loss suffered by the Plaintiff was the overpayment that formed the basis for the liquidated claim, and it already has judgment for that. The claim for damages must therefore be dismissed.
The claim for interest at commercial bank rates is also not justified. Such claim will usually be founded on a contract, which is not the case here. The Plaintiff can therefore only get interest at court rates.
In the result I will enter judgment for the Plaintiff for the sum of Kshs.2,529,629. 00 plus interest thereon at court rates from the date of filing suit until payment in full. The Plaintiff will also have costs of the suit and interest thereon at court rates. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT
THIS 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2004.
H.P.G. WAWERU
JUDGE