[2013] KEHC 4698 (KLR)
The court held that the cross-petition, which sought damages and other relief for statements made in the course of the withdrawn petition, could not be sustained. The right of access to court under Articles 22 and 48 of the Constitution protects parties from liability for statements made in the course of legal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4698 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Society for the Mentally Handicapped; Respondent: Samuel Njuguna Kabue; Respondent: Hellen Mudora Obande; Respondent: Phoebe A Nyagudi; Respondent: John S Halake; Respondent: Patience Chome; Respondent: Phitalis Were Masakhwe; Respondent: Julius Nabende; Respondent: Hon Josephine Sinyo; Respondent: Hon Justin Muturi; Respondent: Muthoni Kihara; Respondent: Joseph M Shiroko; Respondent: Simon J Ndubai; Respondent: Susan Kirima; Respondent: Eunice Kahoi; Respondent: Joseph Wamathaga; Respondent: Catherine Amunga Wameyo; Respondent: Lynnette Muganda; Respondent: Beatrice Odundo; Respondent: Cecilia Mbaka; Respondent: Kizito Omukanga; Respondent: Isaac Simiyu Manyonge; Respondent: Josephine Pakata; Respondent: Jackson Lokwatom; Respondent: John F Olinga; Respondent: Francis Asiema; Respondent: Jayne Asuma; Respondent: Charles O Anyango; Respondent: Rukia Ahmed; Respondent: David Ole Sankok; Respondent: Anastacia Magoma; Respondent: Salome Wanjiku Kimata; Respondent: Tom Gichuhi; Respondent: Paddy Onyango; Respondent: Florence Pakata; Respondent: Geoffrey M Wathigo; Respondent: Josephat O Mukobe; Respondent: Mbarak S Twahir; Respondent: Titus M Kilika; Respondent: Anne Muthoni Kagwi; Respondent: Isaac Muigua Mwaura; Respondent: Godliver Omondi; Respondent: Fatma Wangare Haji; Respondent: Alice Mitine; Respondent: James Kariuki Ndwiga; Respondent: Peter Wango
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 490 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Cross Petition After Withdrawal of Main Petition
- Outcome
- cross-petition struck out; costs awarded to respondents
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Access to Justice, Striking Out Pleadings, Costs Awards
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Society for the Mentally Handicapped
Applicant
Samuel Njuguna Kabue
Respondent
Hellen Mudora Obande
Respondent
Phoebe A Nyagudi
Respondent
John S Halake
Respondent
Patience Chome
Respondent
Phitalis Were Masakhwe
Respondent
Julius Nabende
Respondent
Hon Josephine Sinyo
Respondent
Hon Justin Muturi
Respondent
Muthoni Kihara
Respondent
Joseph M Shiroko
Respondent
Simon J Ndubai
Respondent
Susan Kirima
Respondent
Eunice Kahoi
Respondent
Joseph Wamathaga
Respondent
Catherine Amunga Wameyo
Respondent
Lynnette Muganda
Respondent
Beatrice Odundo
Respondent
Cecilia Mbaka
Respondent
Kizito Omukanga
Respondent
Isaac Simiyu Manyonge
Respondent
Josephine Pakata
Respondent
Jackson Lokwatom
Respondent
John F Olinga
Respondent
Francis Asiema
Respondent
Jayne Asuma
Respondent
Charles O Anyango
Respondent
Rukia Ahmed
Respondent
David Ole Sankok
Respondent
Anastacia Magoma
Respondent
Salome Wanjiku Kimata
Respondent
Tom Gichuhi
Respondent
Paddy Onyango
Respondent
Florence Pakata
Respondent
Geoffrey M Wathigo
Respondent
Josephat O Mukobe
Respondent
Mbarak S Twahir
Respondent
Titus M Kilika
Respondent
Anne Muthoni Kagwi
Respondent
Isaac Muigua Mwaura
Respondent
Godliver Omondi
Respondent
Fatma Wangare Haji
Respondent
Alice Mitine
Respondent
James Kariuki Ndwiga
Respondent
Peter Wango
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Cross Petition After Withdrawal of Main Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cross-petition should be struck out following the withdrawal of the main petition.
- 2 Whether the respondents are entitled to damages or costs for alleged defamatory statements made in the course of the proceedings.
- 3 Whether statements made in court proceedings can form the basis for liability outside the law of defamation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the cross-petition, which sought damages and other relief for statements made in the course of the withdrawn petition, could not be sustained. The right of access to court under Articles 22 and 48 of the Constitution protects parties from liability for statements made in the course of legal proceedings. If any defamatory statements were made outside the court or published, the appropriate remedy would be under the law of defamation, not through a cross-petition in the same proceedings. The only relief available to the cross-petitioners in this context was an award of costs, which the court granted. The cross-petition was therefore struck out, and the petitioner was...
Court Disposition
cross-petition struck out; costs awarded to respondents
Orders
- The cross-petition dated 30th November 2012 is hereby struck out.
- The petitioner shall bear the costs of the cross-petitioners.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
67 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Petition 490 of 2012 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
KENYA SOCIETY FOR THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED.................PETITIONER
AND
SAMUEL NJUGUNA KABUE...................................................1ST RESPONDENT
HELLEN MUDORA OBANDE.................................................2ND RESPONDENT
PHOEBE A NYAGUDI..............................................................3RD RESPONDENT
JOHN S HALAKE.....................................................................4TH RESPONDENT
PATIENCE CHOME..................................................................5TH RESPONDENT
PHITALIS WERE MASAKHWE..............................................6TH RESPONDENT
JULIUS NABENDE....................................................................7TH RESPONDENT
HON JOSEPHINE SINYO.........................................................8TH RESPONDENT
HON JUSTIN MUTURI..............................................................9TH RESPONDENT
MUTHONI KIHARA.................................................................10TH RESPONDENT
JOSEPH M SHIROKO............................................................11TH RESPONDENT
SIMON J NDUBAI...................................................................12TH RESPONDENT
SUSAN KIRIM A......................................................................13TH RESPONDENT
EUNICE KAHOI.......................................................................14TH RESPONDENT
JOSEPH WAMATHAGA.........................................................15TH RESPONDENT
CATHERINE AMUNGA WAMEYO..........................................16TH RESPONDENT
LYNNETE MUGANDA..............................................................17TH RESPONDENT
BEATRICE ODUNDO...............................................................18TH RESPONDENT
CECILIA MBAKA.....................................................................19TH RESPONDENT
KIZITO OMUKANGA...............................................................20TH RESPONDENT
BEATRICE ODUNDO..............................................................21ST RESPONDENT
ISAAC SIMIYU MANYONGE.................................................22ND RESPONDENT
JOSEPHINE PAKATA.............................................................23RD RESPONDENT
JACKSON LOKWATOM........................................................24TH RESPONDENT
KIZITO OMUKANGA.............................................................25TH RESPONDENT
JOHN F OLINGA.....................................................................26TH RESPONDENT
BEATRICE ODUNDO.............................................................27TH RESPONDENT
FRANCIS ASIEMA..................................................................28TH RESPONDENT
JAYNE ASUMA.......................................................................29TH RESPONDENT
CHARLES O ANYANGO........................................................30TH RESPONDENT
RUKIA AHMED.......................................................................31ST RESPONDENT
SIMON J NDUBAI..................................................................32ND RESPONDENT
DAVID OLE SANKOK...........................................................33RD RESPONDENT
ANASTACIA MAGOMA.........................................................34TH RESPONDENT
SALOME WANJIKU KIMATA................................................35TH RESPONDENT
TOM GICHUHI.........................................................................36TH RESPONDENT
PADDY ONYANGO..................................................................37TH RESPONDENT
FLORENCE PAKATA...............................................................38TH RESPONDENT
GEOFFREY M WATHIGO........................................................39TH RESPONDENT
JOSEPHAT O MUKOBE........................................................40TH RESPONDENT
MBARAK S TWAHIR.............................................................41ST RESPONDENT
TITUS M KILIKA....................................................................42ND RESPONDENT
ANNE MUTHONI KAGWI.....................................................43RD RESPONDENT
ISAAC MUIGUA MWAURA...................................................44TH RESPONDENT
GODLIVER OMONDI..............................................................45TH RESPONDENT
FATMA WANGARE HAJI.......................................................46TH RESPONDENT
ALICE MITINE.........................................................................47TH RESPONDENT
JAMES KARIUKI NDWIGA...................................................48TH RESPONDENT
PETER WANGO .....................................................................50TH RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The genesis of this matter is a dispute between the Kenya Society for the Mentally Handicapped and the respondents, some of who hold various offices in a statutory body, the National Council for Persons with Disabilities.
2. On 24th January 2013, I granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the petition with no order as to costs. In view of the said withdrawal, the cross petition remains in place and I directed the respondents to show cause why the cross petition should not be struck out.
3. The cross petition is dated 30th November 2012 and the main grievance is that the petition was filed with malice, ill will and bad faith towards the respondents particularly given the nature of allegations made against them as officers of a statutory body and the fact that the petition was advertised without leave of this court.
4. My position in the matter is that parties have the right to institute proceedings within our courts particularly to vindicate their fundamental rights and freedom. If words are stated that are defamatory in nature, then a party has a right to have the scandalous and embarrassing material struck out and ordinarily the court will award costs. The cross petition, in my view is such an application. I think it would be against public policy and would undermine the right of access to court guaranteed under Article 22and48 to expose a party to legal proceedings to damage merely on account of matters said and done within proceedings. This is why I will disallow the cross-petition.
5. If matters are said outside the court or published, of and concerning the respondents, in a manner that their reputations are sullied, then the law of defamation provides adequate relief as those matters are clearly outside court proceedings and do not enjoy the sanction of the court. As I have stated the cross-petitioner’s relief in this matter is limited to an award of costs which in this case are deserved.
6. In my view then the proper orders are as follows;
(1)The cross-petition dated 30th November 2012 be and is hereby struck out.
(2)The petitioner shall bear the costs of the cross petitioners.
DATEDand DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 11th March 2013.
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Ms Ashioya instructed by Ashioya and Company Advocates for the respondents.