[2025] KEHC 8553 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 8553 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute through alternative dispute resolution and filed a consent to withdraw the judicial review proceedings. In accordance with Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, which encourages courts to promote alternative dispute resolution, and upon the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 8553 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Tea Growers Association; Respondent: Tea Board of Kenya; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary-Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 139 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Withdrawal by Consent
Outcome
Judicial review proceedings wholly withdrawn by consent; each party to bear its own costs; file closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Withdrawal, Consent Orders, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Alternative Dispute Resolution Judicial Review Withdrawal Consent Orders Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Tea Growers Association

Applicant

Tea Board of Kenya

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary-Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Withdrawal by Consent

  1. 1 Whether the court should adopt the consent of the parties to withdraw the judicial review proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether each party should bear its own costs as agreed in the consent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute through alternative dispute resolution and filed a consent to withdraw the judicial review proceedings. In accordance with Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, which encourages courts to promote alternative dispute resolution, and upon the parties' request, the court adopted the consent as an order. The proceedings were marked as wholly withdrawn, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs, effectively closing the file.

Court Disposition

Judicial review proceedings wholly withdrawn by consent; each party to bear its own costs; file closed.

Orders

  • The consent dated 13/6/2025 and filed on 16/6/2025 is adopted as an order of the court.
  • Judicial review proceedings are marked as wholly withdrawn by consent.