[2018] KEELRC 1173 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1173 (KLR)

The court found that the dispute was referred to court prematurely and unprocedurally, as the conciliation process before the Ministry of Labour had not been completed and the rival union, KUDHEIHA, had not been involved in the process. The conciliator's report indicated doubts about the authenticity of the Claimant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1173 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Tertiary & Schools Workers’ Union - KETASWU; Respondent: The Board of Management, Nyakoiba Secondary School
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 40 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Trade Union Dues, Recognition Agreement, Conciliation Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Dues Recognition Agreement Conciliation Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Tertiary & Schools Workers’ Union - KETASWU

Applicant

The Board of Management, Nyakoiba Secondary School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent should be ordered to remit deducted and withheld trade union dues to the Claimant Union.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent should be compelled to sign a Recognition Agreement with the Claimant Union.
  3. 3 Whether the suit was prematurely filed before completion of conciliation proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute was referred to court prematurely and unprocedurally, as the conciliation process before the Ministry of Labour had not been completed and the rival union, KUDHEIHA, had not been involved in the process. The conciliator's report indicated doubts about the authenticity of the Claimant Union's membership and the withdrawal of employees from KUDHEIHA. In line with statutory requirements and established case law, the court held that the suit lacked merit due to failure to exhaust the conciliation process and dismissed the claim. The Claimant Union was advised to pursue the incomplete conciliation proceedings and involve KUDHEIHA for a final determination.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for being prematurely filed before completion of conciliation.
  • The Claimant Union may pursue the incomplete conciliation proceedings and involve KUDHEIHA.