[2020] KEELRC 919 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 919 (KLR)

The court found that granting the orders sought by the applicant at the interlocutory stage would prejudice the respondent, as it would amount to determining the main claim without a full hearing. The applicant sought orders similar to those in the main claim, and there was no conclusive proof at this stage that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 919 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Commercial, Food & Allied Workers; Respondent: Kamothai Coffee Growers
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 708 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Interlocutory Application (ruling on Notice of Motion for Interim Salary Payment)
Outcome
Application dismissed; parties to proceed to hearing of main claim; costs in the cause.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unpaid Wages, Statutory Deductions, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Interlocutory Relief
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unpaid Wages Statutory Deductions Collective Bargaining Agreement Interlocutory Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food & Allied Workers

Applicant

Kamothai Coffee Growers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Interlocutory Application (ruling on Notice of Motion for Interim Salary Payment)

  1. 1 Whether the court should order the respondent to pay outstanding salaries to its employees for the period January to July 2018 pending the hearing and determination of the main claim.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be compelled to remit statutory deductions with interest to relevant institutions prior to the main hearing.
  3. 3 Whether granting the orders sought at the interlocutory stage would prejudice the respondent by determining the main claim without a full hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that granting the orders sought by the applicant at the interlocutory stage would prejudice the respondent, as it would amount to determining the main claim without a full hearing. The applicant sought orders similar to those in the main claim, and there was no conclusive proof at this stage that the respondent had paid or failed to pay the salaries in contention. The court therefore directed that the parties proceed to prosecute the main claim so that all issues can be resolved comprehensively. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; parties to proceed to hearing of main claim; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The application dated 24th October, 2019 is dismissed.
  • Parties to proceed to prosecute the main claim.