[2022] KEELRC 3909 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 3909 (KLR)

The court found that the application to join the Commissioner for Cooperative Development was not necessary for the effectual and complete adjudication of the dispute. The respondent's attempt to join the Commissioner was viewed as a delay tactic and an abuse of the court process, given that similar matters in the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 3909 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers; Respondent: Endarasha Dairy Farmers Cooperative Society Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E014 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Joinder and Amendment of Pleadings
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the claimant/respondent
Judges
DKN Marete
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Union Dues Deduction, Amendment of Pleadings
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Joinder of Parties Union Dues Deduction Amendment of Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers

Applicant

Endarasha Dairy Farmers Cooperative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Joinder and Amendment of Pleadings

  1. 1 Whether the Commissioner for Cooperative Development should be joined as a party to the proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether leave should be granted to amend pleadings to effect the joinder.
  3. 3 Whether the application for joinder constitutes an abuse of court process or causes undue delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to join the Commissioner for Cooperative Development was not necessary for the effectual and complete adjudication of the dispute. The respondent's attempt to join the Commissioner was viewed as a delay tactic and an abuse of the court process, given that similar matters in the cooperative sector have been resolved without the Commissioner's involvement. The court held that the application was frivolous, vexatious, and intended to distract from the main issues, and therefore dismissed it with costs to the claimant/respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the claimant/respondent

Orders

  • The application dated March 21, 2022 is dismissed with costs to the claimant/respondent.