[2023] KEELRC 2128 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2128 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had not demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant review of the judgment delivered on 31st October, 2022. The absence of the respondent from the computation meetings did not prevent the conciliator from carrying out the computation of dues as ordered by the court. The appropriate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2128 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers; Respondent: Komothai Coffee Growers Co-op Society Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E055 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review and Extension of Time for Computation of Dues
Outcome
Application for review dismissed; time for computation of dues extended by 90 days.
Judges
ON Makau
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreements, Unlawful Termination, Computation of Dues, Service Gratuity
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreements Unlawful Termination Computation of Dues Service Gratuity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers

Applicant

Komothai Coffee Growers Co-op Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review and Extension of Time for Computation of Dues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant has shown sufficient cause for review of the judgment delivered on 31st October, 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the court should extend the time for computation of dues as previously ordered.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had not demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant review of the judgment delivered on 31st October, 2022. The absence of the respondent from the computation meetings did not prevent the conciliator from carrying out the computation of dues as ordered by the court. The appropriate course of action was not to seek review, but to seek an extension of time for the conciliator to complete the computation, with or without the attendance of all parties. Consequently, the application for review was rejected, but the court extended the period for computation of dues by a further ninety days from the date of the ruling. The conciliator is directed to invite the...

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed; time for computation of dues extended by 90 days.

Orders

  • The application for review is rejected.
  • The time for computation of dues by the conciliator is extended by ninety (90) days from the date of the ruling.