[2023] KEELRC 422 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 422 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's motion sought to set aside dismissal orders dated November 24, 2021, but no such orders existed, as the suit was actually dismissed for want of prosecution on December 1, 2021. Since the relief sought was directed at non-existent orders, the application was fundamentally...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 422 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers; Respondent: Mombasa Water Supply & Sanitation Co. Ltd; Respondent: Kenya County Government Workers Union
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 418 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Reinstatement of Suit, Court Procedure, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Reinstatement of Suit Court Procedure Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers

Applicant

Mombasa Water Supply & Sanitation Co. Ltd

Respondent

Kenya County Government Workers Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the court can set aside dismissal orders dated November 24, 2021, when the actual dismissal occurred on December 1, 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the application for reinstatement of the suit is competent given the orders sought do not exist.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's motion sought to set aside dismissal orders dated November 24, 2021, but no such orders existed, as the suit was actually dismissed for want of prosecution on December 1, 2021. Since the relief sought was directed at non-existent orders, the application was fundamentally incompetent. The court therefore dismissed the application without considering its merits, holding that it is not possible to set aside or reinstate a suit based on orders that were never issued. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated February 15, 2022 is dismissed.
  • Each party will bear their own costs of the application.