[2017] KEELRC 583 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 583 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence on record that the auctioneer had served the application for police assistance as previously directed. Compliance with service requirements is fundamental to the fair hearing of applications, especially those affecting the rights of parties. The court therefore ordered that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 583 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Allied Workers; Respondent: Silver Hotel-Naivasha; Applicant: Geoffrey I. Kariuki t/a Direct O. Auctioneers
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 169 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Execution Application / Interlocutory Application for Police Assistance in Execution
Outcome
Application adjourned for service; conditional dismissal if not served by deadline.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Police Assistance, Auctioneer Powers
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Execution of Judgment Police Assistance Auctioneer Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Allied Workers

Applicant

Silver Hotel-Naivasha

Respondent

Geoffrey I. Kariuki t/a Direct O. Auctioneers

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Execution Application / Interlocutory Application for Police Assistance in Execution

  1. 1 Whether the auctioneer is entitled to police assistance in executing the court decree.
  2. 2 Whether the application for police assistance was properly served on the parties as directed by the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence on record that the auctioneer had served the application for police assistance as previously directed. Compliance with service requirements is fundamental to the fair hearing of applications, especially those affecting the rights of parties. The court therefore ordered that the application be served for inter partes hearing by a set deadline, failing which the application would stand dismissed with costs to the respondent. The court emphasized the necessity of proper service and adherence to procedural directions as a precondition for granting the orders sought.

Court Disposition

Application adjourned for service; conditional dismissal if not served by deadline.

Orders

  • The motion is to be served for inter partes hearing on or before 19 October 2017 and heard on 24 October 2017.
  • Appropriate affidavit(s) of service to be filed.