[2018] KEELC 4509 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4509 (KLR)

The court found that the grievant was suspended indefinitely without being issued a letter of termination, was not given a notice to show cause, nor afforded a hearing as required by section 41 of the Employment Act. The respondent failed to file a defence or contest the claim. The court held that the termination...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4509 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospitals (KUDHEIHA); Respondent: Board of Management Matinyani Secondary
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 689‘B of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
MN Nduma, DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Service Pay, Notice Pay, Procedural Fairness, Compensation for Loss, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Service Pay Notice Pay Procedural Fairness Compensation for Loss Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospitals (KUDHEIHA)

Applicant

Board of Management Matinyani Secondary

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the grievant's employment was terminated unfairly and wrongfully contrary to the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the grievant is entitled to service pay, notice pay, and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether due process under section 41 of the Employment Act was followed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grievant was suspended indefinitely without being issued a letter of termination, was not given a notice to show cause, nor afforded a hearing as required by section 41 of the Employment Act. The respondent failed to file a defence or contest the claim. The court held that the termination was both procedurally and substantively unfair under sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act. The grievant was entitled to service pay as he was not registered with NSSF, notice pay for lack of notice, and compensation for unfair termination. Considering the length of service, the circumstances of the case, and relevant precedents, the court awarded the grievant ten months'...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay Kshs.66,960 being equivalent of 10 months salary as compensation for unfair termination.
  • Respondent to pay Kshs.6,696 in lieu of one month notice.