[2023] KEELRC 2475 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2475 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's actions—sending the grievants on unpaid leave due to operational challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, failing to recall them to work, and ultimately remaining silent—constituted redundancy as defined under the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent did not follow the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2475 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospitals Workers (KUDHEIHA); Respondent: Hanos (K) Limited t/a Papillion Garden Bar Villa
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Redundancy, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Terminal Dues, Severance Pay, Notice Pay, Unpaid Leave
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Redundancy Collective Bargaining Agreement Terminal Dues Severance Pay Notice Pay Unpaid Leave

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 16
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospitals Workers (KUDHEIHA)

Applicant

Hanos (K) Limited t/a Papillion Garden Bar Villa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the grievants' employment amounted to redundancy under the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent complied with the law and the Collective Bargaining Agreement in effecting the redundancy.
  3. 3 Whether the grievants are entitled to terminal dues including notice pay, severance pay, and annual leave pay for 2020.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's actions—sending the grievants on unpaid leave due to operational challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, failing to recall them to work, and ultimately remaining silent—constituted redundancy as defined under the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent did not follow the statutory and CBA procedures for redundancy, including proper notice and payment of terminal dues. The court held that the grievants were entitled to notice pay, annual leave for 2020, and severance pay as per the CBA. Gratuity was not awarded as it is only payable upon termination for good cause, not redundancy. The respondent's failure to participate in the proceedings or...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the grievants notice pay, annual leave for 2020, and severance pay as specified in the judgment.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant costs assessed at Kshs. 300,000.