[2023] KEELRC 1669 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1669 (KLR)

The court found that the 67 grievants, including the 12 non-union members, were entitled to service gratuity under clause 25.0 of the CBA. The court held that termination of employment encompasses expiry of fixed term contracts, and that denying gratuity on the basis that contracts ended by effluxion of time would...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1669 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospitals Workers; Respondent: The University Council of Technical University of Mombasa
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E002 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreements, Service Gratuity, Fixed Term Contracts, Termination of Employment, Non Discrimination, Union Representation
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreements Service Gratuity Fixed Term Contracts Termination of Employment Non Discrimination Union Representation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospitals Workers

Applicant

The University Council of Technical University of Mombasa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's refusal to pay service gratuity to the grievants is unlawful under the CBA and Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant union has locus standi to represent all 67 grievants, including 12 non-members.
  3. 3 Whether termination by effluxion of time under fixed term contracts qualifies for gratuity payment under the CBA.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 67 grievants, including the 12 non-union members, were entitled to service gratuity under clause 25.0 of the CBA. The court held that termination of employment encompasses expiry of fixed term contracts, and that denying gratuity on the basis that contracts ended by effluxion of time would be unjust and contrary to the CBA and statutory protections. The court further determined that non-union members cannot be excluded from CBA benefits, as this would amount to discrimination prohibited by the Employment Act, 2007 and the Constitution. The respondent's objections regarding locus standi and the applicability of Section 73(3) of the Labour Relations Act were...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the grievants Ksh 25,910,285.80 as service gratuity in accordance with clause 25.0 of the CBA.
  • The respondent shall issue certificates of service to the grievants.