[2015] KEELRC 733 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 733 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had entered into a consent settlement resolving all claims raised by the Union on behalf of the Grievants. The consent was filed in court and the terms were clear as to the amounts payable to each Grievant and the schedule of payments. The court adopted the consent as its judgment,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 733 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers; Respondent: Cool Rivers Hotel Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 134 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim settled by consent; judgment entered as per consent terms.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Wages in Lieu of Notice, Underpayment of Wages, Unpaid House Allowance, Unpaid Leave, Settlement by Consent
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Wages in Lieu of Notice Underpayment of Wages Unpaid House Allowance Unpaid Leave Settlement by Consent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers

Applicant

Cool Rivers Hotel Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the Grievants was unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the Grievants are entitled to wages in lieu of notice, underpayments, unpaid house allowance, unpaid leave, travelling allowance and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the parties' consent settlement should be adopted as the judgment of the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had entered into a consent settlement resolving all claims raised by the Union on behalf of the Grievants. The consent was filed in court and the terms were clear as to the amounts payable to each Grievant and the schedule of payments. The court adopted the consent as its judgment, thereby awarding the agreed sums to the Grievants. The court made no order as to costs, reflecting the mutual resolution of the dispute. The essential legal principle is that a consent judgment, once adopted by the court, is binding on the parties and concludes the matter in accordance with its terms.

Court Disposition

Claim settled by consent; judgment entered as per consent terms.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the Grievants as per the consent filed by the parties.
  • 1st Grievant to be paid Kshs 93,350 in two equal instalments of Kshs 46,675 on 25 May 2015 and 25 June 2015.