[2016] KEELRC 1259 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1259 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent failed to discharge its statutory burden under sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007 to prove valid and fair reasons for the termination of the Grievants. The evidence of Charity Njeri and Joseph Kinuthia was unchallenged and established that they were dismissed without...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1259 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers; Respondent: Silver Hotel, Naivasha
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 169 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in favour of the two Grievants who testified; monetary awards granted; no order as to costs.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Employment Contracts, Employee Benefits, Statutory Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Employment Contracts Employee Benefits Statutory Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers

Applicant

Silver Hotel, Naivasha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of employment of Charity Njeri and Joseph Kinuthia by the Respondent was unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the Grievants are entitled to the dues claimed under the Employment Act, 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent failed to discharge its statutory burden under sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007 to prove valid and fair reasons for the termination of the Grievants. The evidence of Charity Njeri and Joseph Kinuthia was unchallenged and established that they were dismissed without due process or justification. The Respondent also failed to pay statutory entitlements such as house allowance, overtime, public holiday pay, and leave. The court concluded that the dismissals were unfair and that the Grievants were entitled to the sums claimed in the Memorandum of Claim.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in favour of the two Grievants who testified; monetary awards granted; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay Charity Njeri KES 556,971.50 as detailed in the judgment.
  • Respondent to pay Joseph Kinuthia KES 257,753.00 as detailed in the judgment.