[2014] KEELRC 2 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 2 (KLR)

The court held that a union's right to represent an employee in legal proceedings is based on the employee's membership in the union, not on the existence of a recognition agreement with the employer. The court found that the claimant union had specifically pleaded and proved, through affidavit evidence, that Mr....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 2 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organizations (KUEVAVO); Respondent: Tailors and Textiles Workers Union
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 171 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Union Locus Standi, Employee Representation, Recognition Agreement, Union Membership
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Union Locus Standi Employee Representation Recognition Agreement Union Membership

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organizations (KUEVAVO)

Claimant

Tailors and Textiles Workers Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the claimant union has locus standi to represent Mr. Cosmas Okongo Orowe in the absence of a recognition agreement with the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether union membership must be specifically pleaded and proved to establish right of representation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a union's right to represent an employee in legal proceedings is based on the employee's membership in the union, not on the existence of a recognition agreement with the employer. The court found that the claimant union had specifically pleaded and proved, through affidavit evidence, that Mr. Cosmas Okongo Orowe was a member of the union. Therefore, the claimant union had locus standi to represent the grievant. The preliminary objection raised by the respondent was dismissed, and the matter was ordered to proceed to trial on its merits.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed.
  • The matter is to proceed to trial on the merits.