[2017] KEELRC 1651 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1651 (KLR)

The court found that the prayers sought by the Claimant were omnibus and revolved around the core issue of the Claimant's membership status within the Respondent's establishment. The court held that these substantive issues could not be determined at the interlocutory stage and declined to grant the orders sought....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1651 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees; Respondent: Bomas of Kenya Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2066 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
interlocutory application dismissed
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Union Recognition, Collective Bargaining Agreements, Interlocutory Injunctions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Union Recognition Collective Bargaining Agreements Interlocutory Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees

Claimant

Bomas of Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Cabinet Secretary for East Africa Community, Labour and Social Security should be enjoined as an interested party.
  2. 2 Whether the Cabinet Secretary and Deputy Registrar should be restrained from registering any CBA between the Respondent and any union other than the Claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the operation of any CBA between the Respondent and any other union registered after 8th December 2016 should be stayed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prayers sought by the Claimant were omnibus and revolved around the core issue of the Claimant's membership status within the Respondent's establishment. The court held that these substantive issues could not be determined at the interlocutory stage and declined to grant the orders sought. The court directed the parties to set down the main claim for hearing on a priority basis, emphasizing that the proper forum for resolving the underlying disputes was the substantive hearing rather than through piecemeal interlocutory applications.

Court Disposition

interlocutory application dismissed

Orders

  • The Claimant's application dated 24th October 2016 is declined.
  • Parties are directed to set down the main claim for hearing on a priority basis.