[2018] KEELRC 1996 (KLR)
The Court found that the Respondent, as sued, does not exist as a juristic person, which is a fatal defect in proceedings seeking union recognition. Additionally, the Union failed to comply with the mandatory pre-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms by reporting a trade dispute before notifying the Respondent or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1996 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees; Respondent: Multimedia University Hotel and Conference Centre Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 499 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Application and Memorandum of Claim
- Outcome
- Claim and application struck out for want of proper party and failure to comply with pre-litigation procedures.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Union Recognition, Trade Dispute Procedure, Juristic Personality, Union Dues Deduction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees
Applicant
Multimedia University Hotel and Conference Centre Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Application and Memorandum of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent is a proper juristic person capable of being sued for recognition of a union.
- 2 Whether the Union followed the mandatory pre-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms under the Labour Relations Act before filing the claim.
- 3 Whether the Union is entitled to interim orders for deduction and remittance of union dues and protection from victimisation.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Respondent, as sued, does not exist as a juristic person, which is a fatal defect in proceedings seeking union recognition. Additionally, the Union failed to comply with the mandatory pre-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms by reporting a trade dispute before notifying the Respondent or the University of its intention to organise. This contravened the principle of good faith in industrial relations. Consequently, both the application and the Memorandum of Claim were found to be incompetent and unmerited, warranting their being struck out.
Court Disposition
Claim and application struck out for want of proper party and failure to comply with pre-litigation procedures.
Orders
- The Memorandum of Claim and the attendant application are struck out.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 499 OF 2018
KENYA UNION OF ENTERTAINMENT AND MUSIC
INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES..........................CLAIMANT
V
MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY HOTEL AND
CONFERENCE CENTRE LTD.............RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees (the Union) commenced legal proceedings against Multimedia University Hotel & Conference Centre Ltd (Respondent) on 12 April 2018.
2. The Union stated the Issue in Dispute asRefusal by the Respondent to accord the Claimant herein Recognition Agreement, refusal to comply with Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007 by way of deducting ’’and remittance of union dues and victimisation of the Claimant members’’.
3. Filed together with the Memorandum of Claim was a motion seeking
1. …
2. …
3. THAT interim orders be issued against the Respondent to comply with Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act by way of deducting and remittance of union dues till the hearing and determination of this suit.
4. THAT the Honourable Court deem it fit to issue interim orders (sic) the Respondent from victimising the applicant members on ground of trade union activities/affiliation and or pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
5. THAT the Honourable Court to allow the parties to proceed by way of written submissions to dispose off the main suit.
4. The Respondent filed grounds of opposition on 30 April 2018 and a replying affidavit in opposition to the application on 2 May 2018, and the Court took arguments on 9 May 2018.
5. The Union’s case is that it recruited some employees of the Respondent and that it sent to the Respondent Form S to enable it start deducting and remitting union dues, but the Respondent failed to comply.
6. As a result, a trade dispute was reported to the Cabinet Secretary, Labour and because the Respondent failed to attend, a Certificate of Unresolved Dispute under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act was issued on 15 March 2018.
7. In opposing the application two main reasons were advanced.
8. The first reason advanced was that the Respondent does not exist as a juristic person but as a unit of Multimedia University.
9. The other key ground advanced was that the Union reported a trade dispute to the Cabinet Secretary, Labour on 30 November 2017, while it wrote to University on 1 December 2017 informing it of the recruitment of some 49 employees. The dispute, it was urged was premature.
10. Part VIII of the Labour Relations Act provides for pre- litigation dispute resolution mechanisms.
11. It is apparent that the Union short-circuited that process by reporting a trade dispute even before it had informed the Respondent or the University that it intended to exercise its right to organise.
12. That runs counter to the principle of good faith in industrial relations, and it would incline the Court not to grant the orders sought.
13. Further, the Respondent as sued does not exist.
14. In the view of the Court, that is a fatal defect in this type of proceedings where recognition is being sought.
15. On that ground, it is not only the application which is incompetent and unmerited, but the Memorandum of Claim as well.
16. The Court therefore comes to the conclusion that the present proceedings ought to be terminated by being struck out.
17. In the event, the Court orders that the Memorandum of Claim filed in Court and the attendant application be struck out with no order as to costs.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 15th day of May 2018.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Union Mr. Mucuha, Secretary General, Kenya Union of Entertainment & Music Industry Employees
For Respondent Mr. Deya instructed by Miller & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey