[2019] KEELRC 153 (KLR)
The court found that deduction and remission of union dues, as ordered in the judgment, do not prejudice the respondent because the funds belong to union members. Therefore, the order for deduction and remission of union dues should not be stayed. However, the requirement to conclude a recognition agreement is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 153 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employers; Respondent: Multimedia University
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 759 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- conditional stay of execution granted in part
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Union Recognition, Union Dues Deduction, Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employers
Applicant
Multimedia University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending the determination of the intended appeal.
- 2 Whether deduction and remission of union dues should be stayed pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the requirement to conclude a recognition agreement should be stayed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that deduction and remission of union dues, as ordered in the judgment, do not prejudice the respondent because the funds belong to union members. Therefore, the order for deduction and remission of union dues should not be stayed. However, the requirement to conclude a recognition agreement is amenable to a stay in the interest of justice, to allow the respondent to pursue its intended appeal. The court granted a conditional stay of execution: the respondent must continue deducting and remitting union dues as per the judgment, and must file the record of appeal by 1st March 2020, failing which execution may proceed for the entire decree. Costs of the application will...
Court Disposition
conditional stay of execution granted in part
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment and decree pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal, subject to the applicant fully complying with the order for deduction and remission of union dues until the appeal is heard and determined.
- The applicant to file the record of appeal not later than 1st March 2020, failing which execution to issue for the entire decree as appropriate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 759 OF 2018
KENYA UNION OF ENTERTAINMENT AND
MUSIC INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS.................................CLAIMANT
-VERSUS-
MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY..................................RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Thursday 19th December, 2019)
RULING
The judgment in the suit was delivered on 01. 11. 2019 in favour of the claimant and against the respondent for:
a) The respondent to continue deducting and remitting the union dues on monthly basis for its staff being members of the claimant union.
b) The parties to conclude the recognition agreement by 15. 12. 2019 to pave way for negotiation of the relevant CBA.
c) Each party to bear own costs of the suit.
The respondent filed an application on 19. 11. 2019 through Miller & Company Advocates. The application was supported by the affidavit of Mumbi S. Mwihurih annexed thereto. The application was under Order 42 Rule 6(1) and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and all enabling provisions of the law. The substantive prayers are for orders:
a) There be a stay of execution of the judgment entered on the 1st November 2019 pending the hearing and determination of the respondent’s intended appeal.
b) The Court be pleased to grant the orders sought herein subject to any conditions as the Court may deem fit.
c) That the costs of this application be provided for.
The application is urged upon the following supporting grounds:
a) The judgment was delivered on 01. 11. 2019 in the claimant’s favour. The recognition agreement was to be finalised on 15. 12. 2019. Union dues were to be deducted and remitted.
b) The applicant is dissatisfied by the judgement. A notice of appeal has been filed and certified copies of proceedings have been applied for.
c) The temporary order of stay of execution is lapsing on 15. 12. 2019
d) If application is not granted the claimant will proceed to execute the same.
e) The applicant will comply with any terms of security as precondition to granting of the application.
The claimant urged the Court to rely on the material on record and to render a ruling.
The Court has considered the orders in the judgment. Order 1 relates to deduction of union dues and remitting the same to the claimant with respect to employees who have joined the claimant. The money to be deducted belongs to the union members. The Court returns that in such circumstances continued deduction and remission will not prejudice the applicant and order (a) will not be stayed accordingly.
The Court considers that order (b) in the judgment is amenable to being stayed in the interest of justice to allow the applicant ventilate the proposed appeal.
In conclusion, the application date 29. 11. 2019 is hereby determined with orders:
a) There be stay of execution of the judgment and decree herein pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal against the judgment but subject to the following conditions:
i. the applicant to fully comply with order (a) in the judgment until the appeal is heard and determined; and
ii. the applicant to file the record of appeal not later than 01. 03. 2020 and in default execution to issue for the entire decree as appropriate.
b) The costs of the application to abide the outcome of the intended appeal.
Signed, dated and delivered in court at Nairobi this Thursday, 19th December, 2019.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE