[2017] KEELRC 507 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 507 (KLR)

The court found that both its original judgment and subsequent ruling were clear and unambiguous regarding the issue of interest on the decretal sum. The application by the claimant was deemed an attempt to cover up its own failure to ensure calculation and payment of interest as per the decree issued. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 507 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Journalists and Allied Workers; Respondent: Sunday Express Newspaper Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1041 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Application for Interest Interpretation
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Interest on Decretal Sum, Interpretation of Judgment, Court Rates, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Interest on Decretal Sum Interpretation of Judgment Court Rates Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Journalists and Allied Workers

Applicant

Sunday Express Newspaper Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Application for Interest Interpretation

  1. 1 Whether the court's judgment and ruling were ambiguous regarding the award of interest on the decretal sum.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a further direction on calculation of interest at court rates from the date of filing suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both its original judgment and subsequent ruling were clear and unambiguous regarding the issue of interest on the decretal sum. The application by the claimant was deemed an attempt to cover up its own failure to ensure calculation and payment of interest as per the decree issued. The court held that there was no basis for further interpretation or direction, and that the application was frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to be offset against the interest payable once calculated.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 12th January 2017 is dismissed with costs to be offset against the interest payable once calculated.