[2021] KECPT 575 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had sufficiently proved that a loan was advanced to the Respondent, who subsequently defaulted on repayment. The Claimant provided documentary evidence of the loan, the repayment plan, and the Respondent's default, including demand letters and financial statements. The Tribunal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KECPT 575 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenya Union of Savings & Credit Cooperatives Limited (KUSCCO); Respondent: Ogembo Tea Sacco Society Limited
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 258 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Loan Default, Breach of Contract, Cooperative Societies
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenya Union of Savings & Credit Cooperatives Limited (KUSCCO)
Applicant
Ogembo Tea Sacco Society Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was there a loan advanced to the Respondent by the Claimant?
- 2 Did the Respondent default in repayment of the loan?
- 3 What remedies are available for breach of the loan agreement?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had sufficiently proved that a loan was advanced to the Respondent, who subsequently defaulted on repayment. The Claimant provided documentary evidence of the loan, the repayment plan, and the Respondent's default, including demand letters and financial statements. The Tribunal held that the appropriate remedy for breach of a loan agreement is repayment of the outstanding loan amount with interest, not general damages. As the Respondent failed to appear or defend the claim, judgment was entered in favour of the Claimant for the outstanding sum, interest from the date of filing, and costs. The prayer for general damages for breach was denied.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant for Kshs. 7,252,492 against the Respondent.
- Interest on the sum of Kshs. 7,252,492 from the date of filing suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
60 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL
AT NAIROBI
TRIBUNAL CASE NO258 OF 2020
KENYA UNION OF SAVINGS & CREDIT COOPERATIVES
LIMITED (KUSCCO).................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
OGEMBO TEA SACCO SOCIETY LIMITED...RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant filed Statement of Claim dated 7. 8.2020 on 24. 8.2020. The claim is for repayment of loan advanced to the Respondent in the year 2011 for Kshs.3,740,000/=.The loan fell into arrears and despite several demands by the Claimant the sum of money remained unpaid.
2. The claim is thus for:
a. Damages for breach of contract
b. Kshs. 7,252,492
c. Interest on (a) and (b)
d. Any other relief
e. Costs of the suit.
3. The Respondent despite service as per the Affidavit of Services of Benjamin Mutua sworn on 29. 10. 20 and filed on 6. 11. 2020 evidences service of summons to enter appearance and statement of claim were served on Respondent. The Respondent failed to enter appearance and a Request for Judgment Application dated 29. 10. 2020 was filed.
The Request for Judgment Application was allowed on 18. 11. 2020.
4. The matter was slated for formal proof on 26. 1.21.
CW1 Grace Muiruri gave her evidence adopting her witness statement dated 7. 8.2020. The Statement gives detailed account of the Claimant being an umbrella Co-operative society body and advances credit facilities to member cooperatives.
In the year 2014 the Respondent requested for a loan and an approval for Kshs. 3,740,000/= on 19th June 2014.
5. The Respondent paid their loan for a while then begun defaulting.
Despite demand letters and default notices the Respondent has refused to pay up. The loan accrues interest to 13. 5.% per annum and default penalty of 6% per annum.
The loan plus interest has accumulated to Kshs.7. 252,492 at date of filing suit.
6. There being no statement of Defence we are called up to make a determination.
The Respondent has defaulted paying his loans.
The Claimant has evidenced the:
a. Loan Application and loan agreement forms as advanced.
b. Kuscco cheque payment voucher.
c. Default notices from Kuscco and
d. Demand letters
e. Financial Statements.
7. Issues to be addressed
Issue one:- Was there a loan advanced?
Issue two: Whether the Respondents defaulted in payment of the loans?
Issue three:- Remedies for breach of contract.
8. Issue one:
Was there a loan advanced?
The Claimant has evidenced the loans advanced to the Respondent, when it was advanced and the repayment plan or period 36 monthly installments.
9. Issue two:
Whether the Respondents defaulted in payment of the loans?
The Respondent can be said to have defaulted in the loan repayment. This is evidenced by the default notices from Kuscco requesting for repayment and demand letters from the Respondent Advocates.
10. Issues three:
Question- what is the reason for breach of a loan agreement?
The remedy for any loan is repayment of the loan itself.
11. Issue four:
Are General Damages payable in this instance?
General Damages are awarded and paid in instances where there has been breach.
Conclusion
The upshot of the above is that judgment is entered in favour of claimant against Respondent for:
a. ...
b.
c. Interest of (a) above from date of filing suit.
d. Prayer for damages for breach fails.
e. Costs of suit.
JUDGMENT SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2021
Hon. B. Kimemia Chairperson ....................................
Hon. J. Mwatsama Deputy Chairperson ....................................
Mr. P. Gichuki Member ....................................
Tribunal Clerk .............................