[2020] KEELRC 1318 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1318 (KLR)

The court found that the suit was filed after the expiry of the collective bargaining agreement that governed the employment relationship and long after the alleged infractions occurred. Entertaining such a claim would waste judicial time and resources. The court exercised its discretion to strike out the suit for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1318 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Universities Staff Union; Respondent: The Council of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology; Respondent: Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 107 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
suit struck out
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreements, Limitation of Actions, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreements Limitation of Actions Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Universities Staff Union

Applicant

The Council of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology

Respondent

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the suit was filed within the appropriate time frame as per the applicable collective bargaining agreement and statutory requirements.
  2. 2 Whether the court should entertain a dispute filed after the expiry of the relevant collective bargaining agreement.
  3. 3 Whether the claim constitutes a waste of judicial time and resources.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit was filed after the expiry of the collective bargaining agreement that governed the employment relationship and long after the alleged infractions occurred. Entertaining such a claim would waste judicial time and resources. The court exercised its discretion to strike out the suit for being hopelessly unmerited and for failing to meet the threshold for timely and justiciable claims under employment and labour law. No order as to costs was made, and the judgment's execution was stayed for 14 days in line with COVID-19 mitigation practice directions.

Court Disposition

suit struck out

Orders

  • The suit is struck out for being a waste of judicial time and being hopelessly unmerited.
  • No order as to costs.