[2024] KEELRC 2267 (KLR)
The court found that the trial court delivered judgment without conducting a hearing or obtaining the parties' consent to dispense with a hearing. This omission constituted a gross violation of the rules of natural justice and the constitutional right to a fair hearing under Article 50(1). The absence of any record...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 2267 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kerio Valley Development Authority; Respondent: Serah Jemaiyo Chumba
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; judgment of trial court set aside; matter remitted for retrial; no order as to costs
- Judges
- MA Onyango
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Hearing, Natural Justice, Appeals Process, Setting Aside Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kerio Valley Development Authority
Appellant
Serah Jemaiyo Chumba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred by delivering judgment without hearing the parties.
- 2 Whether the judgment delivered in the absence of a hearing violated the right to a fair hearing under Article 50(1) of the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the judgment of the trial court should be set aside and the matter remitted for retrial.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial court delivered judgment without conducting a hearing or obtaining the parties' consent to dispense with a hearing. This omission constituted a gross violation of the rules of natural justice and the constitutional right to a fair hearing under Article 50(1). The absence of any record of proceedings relating to a hearing confirmed that the parties were not afforded an opportunity to present their cases. Consequently, the judgment of the trial court was declared null and void ab initio, and the matter was remitted to the lower court for hearing and determination by a different magistrate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; judgment of trial court set aside; matter remitted for retrial; no order as to costs
Orders
- The judgment of the trial court dated 23rd March 2022 is set aside.
- The matter shall be referred back to the lower court for hearing and determination by a different magistrate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Kerio Valley Development Authority v Chumba (Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 2267 (KLR) (20 September 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 2267 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2022
MA Onyango, J
September 20, 2024
Between
Kerio Valley Development Authority
Appellant
and
Serah Jemaiyo Chumba
Respondent
(Being an appeal from the whole Judgment of the Honourable Chief Magistrate L. Kassan delivered on 23rd March 2022 in Eldoret CMEL No. 42 of 2019)
Judgment
1. The Appellant herein was the Respondent in the trial court wherein it had been sued by the Claimant, (now the Respondent) seeking to be paid severance package as per what the Respondent claimed the Appellant had initially offered as voluntary early retirement package made on February 2018.
2. Parties filed their respective pleadings as is evident from the record of Appeal filed on 12th May 2023.
3. Judgment was delivered by Hon. L. Kassan on 23rd March 2022.
4. The Appellant being dissatisfied with the said Judgement filed the instant appeal vide the Memorandum of Appeal dated 30th March 2022 and filed on even date. The main ground of appeal is that the learned magistrate erred in law and in fact in entering judgment without hearing the parties. The Appellant therefore sought for the following reliefs:a.The Appeal be allowedb.The Judgment of the subordinate court be set asidec.That there be a re-trial of the caused.That each party bears its costs of the Appeal
5. The appeal was disposed of by way of written submissions pursuant to the directions of this court made on 8th June 2023. The Appellant’s submissions were filed on 8th July 2023 while the Respondent filed her submissions on 25th July 2023.
Analysis and determination 6. It is the duty of this court, as the first appellate court, to examine matters of both law and fact and subject the whole of the evidence to a fresh and exhaustive scrutiny, drawing its own conclusions from that analysis and bearing in mind that the court did not have an opportunity to hear the witnesses firsthand. This duty was stated in the classical case of Selle & another v Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd. & others [1968] E.A. 123 and in Peters v Sunday Post Limited [1958] E.A. page 424.
7. I have considered the pleadings and the submissions filed by the respective counsels for the parties. As stated earlier in this judgment, the only ground of appeal raised by the Appellant is that no hearing was conducted before the trial court but the trial magistrate went ahead and delivered a judgment in favour of the Respondent.
8. A cursory look at the record of appeal filed by the Appellant on 12th May 2023 and particularly the certified copy of proceedings from page 85 to page 94 thereof reveals that there are no proceedings relating to the hearing of the matter at the trial court.
9. The right to fair hearing is a principle of Natural Justice and the same cannot be limited as stipulated by Article 25 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. The Constitution, at Article 50(1), provides for fair hearing with regard to any dispute in accordance with the law. It stipulates:“50. (1)Every person has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair and public hearing before a Court or, if appropriate, another independent and impartial tribunal or body.”
10. The parties having not been heard in the trial court and there having been no consent by the parties to have the matter resolved without a hearing, I find that the instant appeal is meritorious as the Judgment delivered by the trial court was issued in gross violation of the rules of natural justice and is therefore null and void ab initio.
11. Consequently, I enter judgment in the following terms:a.The Judgment of the trial court dated 23rd March 2022 is set aside.b.The matter shall be referred back to the lower court for hearing and determination by a different magistrate.c.There shall be no orders as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY ON THIS 20THDAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024MAUREEN ONYANGOJUDGE