[2024] KEELRC 13347 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 13347 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant's revised tabulation of the respondent's entitlement under the Voluntary Early Retirement scheme was accurate and consistent with the trial court's award. The sum of Kshs. 511,895.57 was confirmed as the correct amount, having accounted for the tax waiver applied to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 13347 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kerio Valley Development Authority; Respondent: Martin Kipkorir
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E018 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Relations Appeal / Quantum Judgment After Appeal
Outcome
Appeal on quantum determined; trial court award confirmed.
Judges
MA Onyango
Legal Topics
Voluntary Early Retirement, Terminal Benefits, Tax Waiver Application, Quantum of Award
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Voluntary Early Retirement Terminal Benefits Tax Waiver Application Quantum of Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kerio Valley Development Authority

Appellant

Martin Kipkorir

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Relations Appeal / Quantum Judgment After Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial court's award to the respondent included double or duplicate payments.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's tabulation of payments due under the Voluntary Early Retirement scheme was accurate and comprehensive.
  3. 3 Whether the tax waiver was properly applied to the respondent's outstanding Sacco loan.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant's revised tabulation of the respondent's entitlement under the Voluntary Early Retirement scheme was accurate and consistent with the trial court's award. The sum of Kshs. 511,895.57 was confirmed as the correct amount, having accounted for the tax waiver applied to the respondent's Sacco loan and the balance paid directly to the respondent. The respondent did not contest the tabulation or the application of the tax waiver. The court held that the tax waiver was not payable to the respondent in cash, as it had been used to offset the outstanding Sacco loan. The appellant was ordered to pay the confirmed sum with interest from the date of the trial court...

Court Disposition

Appeal on quantum determined; trial court award confirmed.

Orders

  • The judgment of the trial court awarding the respondent Kshs. 511,895.57 is confirmed.
  • The tax waiver is not payable to the respondent as it was applied to the Sacco loan and the balance paid to the respondent.