[2024] KEHC 14200 (KLR)
The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant spent in custody prior to conviction, as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court held that the applicant's sentence of ten years imprisonment should run from 12th November, 2018, the date he was first...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14200 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Karanu Keru; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application E074 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Computation Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- HI Ong'udi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Computation of Sentence, Pretrial Custody, Sexual Offences, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Karanu Keru
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Computation Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody prior to conviction considered in the computation of his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the trial court erred by failing to take into account the applicant's pre-sentence custodial period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant spent in custody prior to conviction, as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court held that the applicant's sentence of ten years imprisonment should run from 12th November, 2018, the date he was first arraigned in court, thereby giving effect to the statutory requirement that pre-sentence custody be taken into account in the computation of sentence. The application was allowed, and the sentence computation was accordingly adjusted.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The sentence of ten years imprisonment is upheld with an order that the sentence runs from 12th November, 2018 when the applicant was first arraigned in court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Keru v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E074 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 14200 (KLR) (15 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14200 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E074 of 2021
HI Ong'udi, J
November 15, 2024
Between
James Karanu Keru
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. James Karanu Keru the Applicant was the accused in Nakuru Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case (Sexual Offences) No. 28 of 2018. He was charged and convicted of the offence of rape contrary to section 3 (1) (a) (c) as read with section 3(3) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 Laws of Kenya. Upon conviction on 21st May, 2021 he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment.
2. He has filed this application dated 5th July, 2021 seeking to have the court invoke the provisions of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and order that his sentence runs from the date he was remanded. The application is supported by his sworn affidavit of even date.
3. This application was heard orally. The applicant repeated his prayer for section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code to be effected, as far as his sentence was concerned.
4. Prosecution counsel Mrs Okok did not oppose the application. She confirmed that the period the applicant spent in custody prior to his conviction and sentence was not considered by the trial court. She urged the court to review the sentence and order that the sentence runs from 12th November, 2018 when the applicant was first arraigned in court.
5. I have considered the application dated 5th July, 2018 together with the submissions by both parties. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code provides:“(2)Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code every sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code.Provided that where the person sentenced under sub section (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spend in custody”.
6. A perusal of the original record in Nakuru Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case (Sexual Offences) No. 28 of 2018 reveals that the trial court in sentencing the applicant did not make reference to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
7. The upshot is that the application has merit and is hereby allowed. The sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment is upheld with an order that the sentence runs from 12th November, 2018 when the applicant was first arraigned in court.
8. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED THIS 15THDAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 IN OPEN COURT AT NAKURU.H. I. ONG’UDIJUDGE