[2021] KEHC 9243 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9243 (KLR)

The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for review or reduction of sentence while an appeal against conviction and sentence is pending before it. The rationale is that the appellate process must be exhausted before a party can seek re-sentencing or sentence review. Entertaining such an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9243 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kevin Irungu Ndege; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E005 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed as premature
Judges
JK Mulwa
Legal Topics
Sentencing Review, Appeal Pending, Sexual Offences, Custodial Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Review Appeal Pending Sexual Offences Custodial Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Irungu Ndege

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can entertain an application for review or reduction of sentence while an appeal against conviction and sentence is pending determination.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to re-sentencing before exhausting the appellate process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for review or reduction of sentence while an appeal against conviction and sentence is pending before it. The rationale is that the appellate process must be exhausted before a party can seek re-sentencing or sentence review. Entertaining such an application while the appeal is pending would be premature and contrary to established judicial procedure. The applicant's request was therefore dismissed as premature, with the court emphasizing that only after the appeal is determined, and if unsuccessful, can the applicant move the court for re-sentencing.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as premature

Orders

  • The application for review/reduction of sentence is dismissed.