[2021] KEHC 3894 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3894 (KLR)

The court found that the application failed to disclose the date when the sentence was imposed or when judgment was delivered. This omission of material particulars rendered the application lacking in merit. Consequently, the court declined to grant leave to appeal out of time and dismissed the application for want...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 3894 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kevin Onyango; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E101 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Criminal Appeals, Procedural Requirements
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Out of Time Criminal Appeals Procedural Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Onyango

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient material particulars to warrant leave to appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal out of time has merit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application failed to disclose the date when the sentence was imposed or when judgment was delivered. This omission of material particulars rendered the application lacking in merit. Consequently, the court declined to grant leave to appeal out of time and dismissed the application for want of material particulars and merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed for want of material particulars and merit.
  • File is closed.