[2009] KEHC 3997 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent willfully refused to consummate the marriage after it was solemnized, and that the petitioner had not colluded with the respondent in presenting the petition. The petitioner's testimony was uncontroverted and credible. The court was satisfied that the legal requirements for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 3997 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: KGA; Respondent: JKR
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 142 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage declared null and void
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Nullity of Marriage, Non Consummation, Matrimonial Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KGA
Applicant
JKR
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties should be declared null and void due to willful non-consummation by the respondent.
- 2 Whether there was any collusion between the parties in presenting the petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent willfully refused to consummate the marriage after it was solemnized, and that the petitioner had not colluded with the respondent in presenting the petition. The petitioner's testimony was uncontroverted and credible. The court was satisfied that the legal requirements for nullity on the ground of non-consummation were met, and therefore declared the marriage null and void.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage declared null and void
Orders
- The marriage solemnized between the parties is declared null and void.
- The decree nisi be made absolute within 45 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
DIVORCE CAUSE 142 OF 2007
KGA...…………………………PETITIONER
VERSUS
JKR...…………………...….RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
This petition seeks prayers to declare the marriage solemnized between the parties herein as null and void on the ground of willful non-consummation of the marriage by the Respondent herein.
The Respondent despite being served has not entered her appearance and her response.
The Petitioner in his testimony briefly stated that he married the Respondent on 30th August, 2006 under the Marriage Act and he produced the Marriage certificate. The certificate does show that the Petitioner/husband was 21 years of age and the Respondent was 25 years of age at the time of the marriage. He testified that the marriage was arranged by their respective parents to bring the two families closer and that is why he was married at an early age of 21 years.
The Respondent, after the marriage was solemnized, refused to consummate the marriage and totally disappeared. Despite the efforts of his parents, the Respondent did not agree to consummate the marriage without giving any reasons. Afterwards it became quit clear that the Respondent is not willing to consummate the marriage, he filed the present petition.
They both are domiciled in Kenya.
He denied that he has presented or prosecuted the petition in collusion with the Respondent. The above testimony remained uncontroverted. Moreover, I did find the Petitioner as a credible witness showing distress on his position. I am also satisfied that the parties have not colluded in presenting this petition, and that the Respondent after agreeing to enter into matrimonial bond, has refused to consummate the marriage. Thus the Petitioner has proved his case as per the required standard of proof in the Matrimonial causes.
In the premises, aforesaid I do declare the marriage solemnized between the parties as null and void.
The decree nisi be made absolute within 45 days so that the young man can move on with his life.
I shall not make any order on costs.
Dated and signed at Nairobi this 29th day of 09.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
29. 1.09