[2025] KEHC 1855 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 1855 (KLR)

The court found that the application was unopposed as the respondent failed to file any response or attend the hearing despite proper service. The applicant had established that costs were taxed and certified, and the respondent had not settled the amount. In accordance with Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 1855 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Andrew B Khakula t/a JS Khakula & Co Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E010 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed as prayed
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Judgment Entry, Interest Award, Unopposed Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Judgment Entry Interest Award Unopposed Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew B Khakula t/a JS Khakula & Co Advocates

Applicant

Trident Insurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs against the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum from 25th July, 2024, should be awarded on the judgment sum.
  3. 3 Whether the costs of the application should be awarded to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was unopposed as the respondent failed to file any response or attend the hearing despite proper service. The applicant had established that costs were taxed and certified, and the respondent had not settled the amount. In accordance with Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and the Civil Procedure Act, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed sum, interest at 14% per annum from the date of the certificate of costs, and costs of the application. The court therefore allowed the application as prayed.

Court Disposition

application allowed as prayed

Orders

  • Judgment in the taxed sum of Kshs. 35,500.00 is entered against the respondent.
  • The applicant is awarded interest at 14% per annum from 25th July, 2024, on the judgment sum.