[2021] KEELRC 1275 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1275 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent from early 2008 to June 2016 as a Pressure Mechanic/Conductor. The respondent failed to provide evidence disproving the claimant's employment details or justifying the termination. The respondent did not substantiate the alleged misconduct or provide...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1275 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Khamisi Mwandia Kalinga; Respondent: Modern Coast Express Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 287 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim partly allowed
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Compensation for Termination, Certificate of Service, Underpayment Claims, Annual Leave Entitlement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice Pay Compensation for Termination Certificate of Service Underpayment Claims Annual Leave Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khamisi Mwandia Kalinga

Claimant

Modern Coast Express Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, and other terminal dues.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was underpaid and denied annual leave and rest days.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent from early 2008 to June 2016 as a Pressure Mechanic/Conductor. The respondent failed to provide evidence disproving the claimant's employment details or justifying the termination. The respondent did not substantiate the alleged misconduct or provide details of the alleged offense, nor did it subject the claimant to a disciplinary hearing or issue a show cause letter. The court held that the termination was procedurally and substantively unfair under Sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act. The claim for underpayment and annual leave was declined due to insufficient evidence. The claimant was awarded one month's salary...

Court Disposition

claim partly allowed

Orders

  • Termination was unfair.
  • Respondent to pay claimant compensation for unfair termination equivalent to 8 months' gross salary at Kshs. 108,848 and 1-month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 13,606, totaling Kshs. 122,454.