[2007] KECA 386 (KLR)

[2007] KECA 386 (KLR)

The Court found that since the record of appeal was served out of time without leave of the court, and the respondent had not made a timely application for extension of time despite being served with the motion nearly a year prior, there was no valid basis to refuse the applicant's prayer to strike out the appeal....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KECA 386 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Khan Mohammed Salim T/A Khan & Associates Advocates; Respondent: National Industrial Credit Bank & 3 Others
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 148 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Appeal
Outcome
Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2006 struck out with costs to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Appeal Striking Out, Service of Record, Extension of Time, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Striking Out Service of Record Extension of Time Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khan Mohammed Salim T/A Khan & Associates Advocates

Applicant

National Industrial Credit Bank & 3 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the record of appeal served out of time without leave of the court renders the appeal liable to be struck out.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be granted leave to apply for extension of time after significant delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that since the record of appeal was served out of time without leave of the court, and the respondent had not made a timely application for extension of time despite being served with the motion nearly a year prior, there was no valid basis to refuse the applicant's prayer to strike out the appeal. The Court determined that the procedural irregularity was fatal and warranted the striking out of Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2006. The Court also found it unnecessary to address other prayers in the motion given the dispositive nature of the procedural default.

Court Disposition

Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2006 struck out with costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2006 is hereby struck out.
  • Costs of the appeal awarded to the applicant.