[2024] KEBPRT 1264 (KLR)

[2024] KEBPRT 1264 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the premises in question are commercial, not residential, and that the relationship between the parties constitutes a controlled tenancy due to the absence of a written agreement. Therefore, the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter under Cap 301. However, the notice to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEBPRT 1264 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Kiangai; Respondent: Jonathan Ngura
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E161 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Application / Ruling
Outcome
Application partly allowed; jurisdiction upheld; eviction declined; rent arrears ordered paid.
Judges
CN Mugambi
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Rent Arrears, Eviction Procedure, Jurisdiction of Tribunal
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Rent Arrears Eviction Procedure Jurisdiction of Tribunal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kiangai

Applicant

Jonathan Ngura

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute regarding the suit premises.
  2. 2 Whether the Landlord is entitled to orders for vacant possession and eviction of the Tenant.
  3. 3 Whether the Tenant owes rent arrears to the Landlord and the enforceability of such claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the premises in question are commercial, not residential, and that the relationship between the parties constitutes a controlled tenancy due to the absence of a written agreement. Therefore, the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter under Cap 301. However, the notice to terminate tenancy issued by the Landlord was found to be defective for failing to specify a clear and effective date of termination, rendering it unenforceable for purposes of granting vacant possession or eviction. Despite this, the Tribunal was satisfied that the Tenant owed rent arrears of Kshs. 154,000, which the Tenant did not deny. The Tribunal thus declined to grant...

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed; jurisdiction upheld; eviction declined; rent arrears ordered paid.

Orders

  • The Tenant's notice of preliminary objection dated 15.7.2024 is dismissed.
  • The Landlord's prayer for vacant possession and eviction is declined.