[2023] KEHC 26812 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 26812 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's request for consideration of the period spent in custody under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code was unsupported, as he failed to provide any documentary evidence, such as copies of proceedings or the judgment, to substantiate his claim regarding the period spent in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 26812 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Isaac Oira Kibagendi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E074 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Custodial Period Credit, Sexual Offences, Defilement, Criminal Procedure Code, Application Dismissal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Custodial Period Credit Sexual Offences Defilement Criminal Procedure Code Application Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Oira Kibagendi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody during trial considered in the computation of his sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the application is supported by sufficient evidence or documentation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's request for consideration of the period spent in custody under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code was unsupported, as he failed to provide any documentary evidence, such as copies of proceedings or the judgment, to substantiate his claim regarding the period spent in custody or the details of his conviction and sentence. The absence of such evidence rendered the application unmeritorious, leading to its dismissal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The file is closed.