[2024] KECPT 955 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 955 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had given sufficient written notice of withdrawal from the Respondent society as required by the by-laws, specifically through her letter dated 15/2/2015. The previous suit was struck out only for being premature, not on the merits, and thus did not bar the present claim. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 955 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Wangithi Kibuchi; Respondent: Faith Foundation Coop Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 544 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the applicant
Judges
J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Society Membership, Share Refunds, Notice of Withdrawal, Procedural Striking Out
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Society Membership Share Refunds Notice of Withdrawal Procedural Striking Out

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Wangithi Kibuchi

Applicant

Faith Foundation Coop Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant gave adequate notice of withdrawal from the cooperative society.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her share contributions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had given sufficient written notice of withdrawal from the Respondent society as required by the by-laws, specifically through her letter dated 15/2/2015. The previous suit was struck out only for being premature, not on the merits, and thus did not bar the present claim. The Tribunal rejected the Respondent's argument that a new notice was required, holding that the original notice sufficed. Although the Respondent disputed the Claimant's contributions, the Tribunal accepted the Claimant's evidence and found her entitled to a refund of Kshs. 193,600, plus costs and interest, as the Respondent failed to adduce contrary evidence or secure a witness...

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicant

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs. 193,600.
  • The Respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.