[2015] KEELC 550 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 550 (KLR)

The court found that the reference to plot number 137 in its earlier judgment was an accidental slip, as all pleadings and the lower court decision referred to plot number 173. This error was apparent on the face of the record and fell within the court's jurisdiction to correct under Section 99 of the Civil...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 550 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kidheka Amutisya Ngata; Respondent: Emmanuel Ngade Nyoka; Interested Party: Schewarz Heldi Sieglinde; Interested Party: Ndilima Maingi Ngunda; Interested Party: George Winjira; Interested Party: Charo Kitsao Tito
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 5 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Rectification and Review
Outcome
Application allowed in part; rectification of judgment granted; review or setting aside of stay order declined; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Rectification of Land Register, Accidental Slip Rule, Review of Judgment, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Rectification of Land Register Accidental Slip Rule Review of Judgment Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kidheka Amutisya Ngata

Appellant

Emmanuel Ngade Nyoka

Respondent

Schewarz Heldi Sieglinde

Interested Party

Ndilima Maingi Ngunda

Interested Party

George Winjira

Interested Party

Charo Kitsao Tito

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Rectification and Review

  1. 1 Whether the court can rectify an accidental slip in the judgment regarding the suit property title number.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to review or set aside its own orders after a lapse of one year.
  3. 3 Whether the stay of execution granted should be reviewed or set aside.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reference to plot number 137 in its earlier judgment was an accidental slip, as all pleadings and the lower court decision referred to plot number 173. This error was apparent on the face of the record and fell within the court's jurisdiction to correct under Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act. However, the court declined to review or set aside the stay of execution order, holding that such matters fall within the purview of the Court of Appeal once a stay has been granted pending appeal. The applicant's remedy for delay in filing the record of appeal lies with the appellate court, not the trial court. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; rectification of judgment granted; review or setting aside of stay order declined; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Prayer (b) of the judgment of 19th December 2013 is rectified to read: 'The Register in regard to Kilifi/Kijipwa/173 be rectified by cancellation of Title Kilifi/Kijipwa/1333, Kilifi/Kijipwa/1334 and Kilifi/Kijipwa/1335 and parcel number 173 be restored in the name of Kidheka Mutsya Ngate.'
  • Each party to bear his own costs.