[2015] KEELRC 83 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated on grounds of redundancy, but the respondent failed to comply with the mandatory procedural and substantive requirements set out in Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007. There was no evidence of notice, consultation, selection criteria, or payment of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 83 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kiio Multya Kisyula; Respondent: Vipingo Beach Resort
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 213 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; termination declared unfair and unlawful; monetary award granted.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Redundancy Procedure, Severance Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kiio Multya Kisyula
Claimant
Vipingo Beach Resort
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair and unlawful.
- 2 Whether the respondent complied with the redundancy procedures under Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal benefits and compensation for unfair termination.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated on grounds of redundancy, but the respondent failed to comply with the mandatory procedural and substantive requirements set out in Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007. There was no evidence of notice, consultation, selection criteria, or payment of redundancy dues. The respondent did not contest the claim or participate in the proceedings, and affidavits of service confirmed they were aware of the case. The court accepted the claimant's evidence as unchallenged and concluded that the termination was both unfair and unlawful. The claimant was therefore entitled to terminal benefits, including payment in lieu of notice, unpaid...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; termination declared unfair and unlawful; monetary award granted.
Orders
- The claimant is awarded 1 month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 12,900; unpaid annual leave of 63 days (3 years) at Kshs. 27,090; severance pay at 15 days’ salary for 4 years at Kshs. 25,800; and compensation for unfair termination at 12 months’ salary at Kshs. 154,800, totaling Kshs. 220,590, payable within 30...
- Termination is declared unfair and unlawful.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NUMBER 213 OF 2015
BETWEEN
KIIO MULTYA KISYULA......................................................... CLAIMANT
VERSUS
VIPINGO BEACH RESORT..................................................RESPONDENT
Rika J
Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe
Ms. Onyango instructed by Katee Omollo & Company Advocates for the Claimant
No appearance for the Respondent
_____________________________
ISSUE IN DISPUTE: UNFAIR AND UNLAWFUL TERMINATION
AWARD
[Rule 27 [1] [a] of the Industrial Court [Procedure] Rules 2010]
1. The Claimant filed his Statement of Claim on the 17th April 2015. He states he was employed by the Respondent as a Casual Worker in the year 2010, earning a daily rate of Kshs. 250. He was later converted into a Security Guard on a daily rate of Kshs. 430. His contract was terminated on the 30th May 2014, on the ground that there was diminished work, requiring the Respondent to declare redundancy. He was paid Kshs. 12,000 for days worked and advised to leave. He feels termination was unfair and unlawful and seeks the following orders against the Respondent:-
a) A declaration that termination was unfair.
b) A declaration that the Claimant was entitled to 1 month leave after every year worked.
c) Payment of: 1 month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 12,900; unpaid annual leave for 4 years at Kshs. 51,600; gratuity at Kshs. 19,350; and compensation for unfair termination the equivalent of 12 months’ salary at Kshs. 154,800 – total Kshs. 238,650.
d) Any other suitable relief.
e) Costs and interest.
2. The Respondent did not file any Response to the Claim, or attend Court on any session. There are Affidavits of Service filed, indicating the Respondent was made aware of the proceedings. The Claimant gave evidence on 2nd September 2015 when the hearing closed.
3. He told the Court he was initially employed as a Casual Worker, deployed in construction sites, and later converted into a Guard. He was informed by the Supervisor Mr. Nelson that there was no more work, on 30th May 2014. There was a list of Employees shown to him by Nelson, of those who would leave, and those who had been selected to stay on. The Claimant was told he would be recalled, but was never recalled. Others were recalled. He was reliable and hardworking and had been honoured with a commendation letter. He prays the Court to allow his Claim.
The Court Finds:-
4. The Claimant’s Pleadings, Evidence and Submissions are without challenge. The Court has no reason to disbelieve that the Claimant was initially employed by the Respondent as a Casual Worker, deployed in construction sites, and later converted into a Guard, earning Kshs. 430 per day. He worked from 2010 to 2014. Termination was at the instance of the Employer, and was explained on the basis of diminished volume of work. In legal terms, termination was on the ground of redundancy calling into play the law of redundancy prescribed under Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007.
5. There is nothing on record to show the Respondent adhered to the procedural and the substantive provisions contained in this law. There are no notices exhibited by the Respondent; there is no evidence of consultation; nothing shows the selection criteria; and there is no evidence of redundancy dues paid to the Claimant as demanded by the law. In sum termination has been shown to have been unfair and unlawful. The Claimant merits terminal benefits and compensation.
6. IT IS OREDERD:
[a]The Claimant is allowed1 month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 12,900; unpaid annual leave of 63 days [3 years] at Kshs. 27,090; severance pay at 15 days’ salary for 4 years completed in service at Kshs. 25,800; and compensation for unfair termination at 12 months’ salary at Kshs. 154,800- total Kshs.220,590, payable within 30 days of the delivery of this Award.
[b] It is declared termination was unfair and unlawful. Other declaratory orders sought add no value to the Award and are rejected.
[c] Costs and interest granted to the Claimant
Dated and deliveed at Mombasa this 9th day of December 2015
James Rika
Judge