[2024] KEELC 7248 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a clear chronology of representation and taxation of costs in two matters involving the respondent. The applicant's bills of costs were taxed and certificates of taxation were issued for both, totaling Ksh. 1,585,501.19. The respondent did not file any response or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 7248 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Gideon Solonka Kilakoi t/a Solonka & Solonka Advocates LLP; Respondent: Kajiado County Government
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E141 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Entry of Judgment on Certificate of Taxation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gideon Solonka Kilakoi t/a Solonka & Solonka Advocates LLP
Applicant
Kajiado County Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs against the respondent.
- 2 Whether the court should enter judgment based on the certificates of taxation issued for the applicant's bills of costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a clear chronology of representation and taxation of costs in two matters involving the respondent. The applicant's bills of costs were taxed and certificates of taxation were issued for both, totaling Ksh. 1,585,501.19. The respondent did not file any response or challenge the application, the retainer, or the amounts taxed. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court is mandated to enter judgment for the amount certified in the absence of any dispute. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and entered judgment in favour of the applicant for the full sum claimed.
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant Gideon Solonka Kilakoi t/a Solonka & Solonka Advocates LLP against the respondent Kajiado County Government in the sum of Ksh. 1,585,501.19 plus interest at court rates from the date of taxation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Kilakoi t/a Solonka & Solonka Advocates LLP v Kajiado County Government (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E141 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 7248 (KLR) (30 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 7248 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E141 of 2024
LN Mbugua, J
October 30, 2024
Between
Gideon Solonka Kilakoi t/a Solonka & Solonka Advocates LLP
Applicant
and
Kajiado County Government
Respondent
Ruling
1. This miscellaneous file was filed by way of a Notice of Motion Application dated 22. 3.2024 where the applicant seeks orders that:“Judgment to be entered in favour of the Applicant herein Gideon Solonka Kilakoi T/A Solonka & Co. Advocates against the Respondent the County Government of Kajiado in the sum of Kshs. 1,585,501. 19/= plus interest at Court rates from the date of taxation”.The application is premised on the grounds on the face of the application and the supporting affidavit of the applicant. He contends that he represented the respondent in the case ELC 232 OF 2006 where the respondents were sued as the interested parties and judgment was delivered on 17. 12. 2020.
2. That an appeal was lodged against the said judgment in the Court of Appeal case no. E071 OF 2021 where again he represented the respondent in which judgment was delivered.
3. That he filed an Advocates –Client Bill of costs dated 6. 7.2023 in the case E232 OF 2006 which was taxed at Ksh.1,022,182. 29 and a Certificate of Taxation was duly issued. He also filed an Advocates – Client Bill of costs dated 1. 8.2023 in Civil Appeal no. E071 OF 2021 which was taxed at Ksh. 563,318. 90, and a Certificate of Taxation was again issued. The total sum is Ksh. 1,585,501. 19 which amount he has tried to get from the respondent in vain.
4. No responses were filed in respect of this application.
5. The provisions of Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act give this court the mandate to enter judgment. In the case at hand, the applicant has given a consistent chronology of the events giving rise to the figure of Ksh. 1,585,501. 19. Their bill of costs dated 6. 7.2023 in ELC 232 OF 2006 was taxed at Ksh. 1,022,182 vide the ruling dated 15. 12. 2023. While the bill of costs in the appeal no. E071 OF 2021 dated 1. 8.2023 was taxed at Ksh. 563,318 vide the ruling dated 8. 11. 2023. The certificate of costs in both instances have been issued.
6. In the circumstances, I find that this miscellaneous suit is merited, the same is hereby allowed as drawn.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 30th DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:Chacha holding brief for M/s Kababa for ApplicantCourt Assistant: Vena