[2010] KEHC 3876 (KLR)
The court found that the suit was incompetent as it was not instituted by way of originating summons as required for claims based on trust in land. Additionally, the court's jurisdiction was ousted by section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act, which precludes the court from determining disputes subject to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3876 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kilatan Alomai; Defendant: Emmanuel Pkiach
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 23 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- suit struck out with costs to the defendant
- Legal Topics
- Trusts in Land, Jurisdiction of Court, Originating Summons Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kilatan Alomai
Plaintiff
Emmanuel Pkiach
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is incompetent for not being instituted by originating summons as required for trust claims.
- 2 Whether section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act ousts the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the suit was incompetent as it was not instituted by way of originating summons as required for claims based on trust in land. Additionally, the court's jurisdiction was ousted by section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act, which precludes the court from determining disputes subject to the adjudication process. As the defendant's preliminary objection was conceded by the plaintiff, the court struck out the suit with costs to the defendant.
Court Disposition
suit struck out with costs to the defendant
Orders
- The suit is struck out with costs to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE
Civil Suit 23 of 2004
KILATAN ALOMAI ....................................PLAINTIFF.
VERSUS
EMMANUEL PKIACH.................................DEFENDANT.
R U L I N G.
The preliminary objection notice is dated 15th December, 2008. It is based on the grounds.
1. That the suit herein is a non-starter, bad in law and incompetent, the claim being based on trust ought to have been instituted by way of originating summons under order XXXVI of the Civil Procedure Rules.
2. Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act (Cap 284) Laws of Kenya ousts the jurisdiction of this court to determine the suit.
3. At paragraph 7 the plaintiff has pleaded thus:-
“The plaintiffs claim against the defendant is for the recovery of a portion measuring 70 acres or thereabouts to be hired from Land parcel No. Chepkono/119 and an order declaring that the defendants is registered and holds the said 70 acres in Trust to the plaintiffs.”
The relief sought are couched in the following terms:-
(a)A declaration that the defendant holds a portion of 70 acres as plot No. 119 in trust to the plaintiff.
(b)An order terminating the trust and requiring the defendant to execute the necessary forms to transfer the said 70 acres of plot No. 119 to the plaintiff and in default the Deputy Registrar of this honourable court to execute the forms on his behalf.
(c)Costs.
(d)Interest.
In the defence at paragraph 6, it is pleaded thus:-
“The defendant shall cover that the plaintiff’s claim of trust, if any, which is denied I incompetent, bad in law and ought to be struck out and/or dismissed”
In the premises, since the defendant conceded the preliminary points of law raised herein this suit be and is hereby struck out with costs to the defendants.
Dated and delivered at Kitale this 20th day of January, 2010.
N.R.O. OMBIJA.
JUDGE.
Mr. Wanyonyi for Onyancha for Defendant.
Mr. Ingosi for Samba for Plaintiff.