[2018] KEELC 1 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1 (KLR)

The court found that both parties were members of the Naibor Ajikjik Group Ranch and were allocated their respective parcels, with the boundary between them being a river. The plaintiff provided credible evidence, including testimony from the former group ranch chairman, a family member, and the district surveyor,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kililwa Ole Nkuruna; Defendant: Parsalloi Ole Nkuruna
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 40 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Land Allocation, Boundary Disputes, Fraudulent Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Allocation Boundary Disputes Fraudulent Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kililwa Ole Nkuruna

Plaintiff

Parsalloi Ole Nkuruna

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant encroached on and annexed approximately 75-78 acres of the plaintiff's land.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration and transfer of the disputed acreage from the defendant's parcel.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant obtained the disputed land through fraudulent or illegal means.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both parties were members of the Naibor Ajikjik Group Ranch and were allocated their respective parcels, with the boundary between them being a river. The plaintiff provided credible evidence, including testimony from the former group ranch chairman, a family member, and the district surveyor, all confirming the plaintiff's claim that the defendant had encroached on his land. The defendant failed to rebut this evidence and did not file submissions despite being given an opportunity. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant had annexed approximately 78 acres of the plaintiff's land. Accordingly, the court...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • A declaration is issued that the plaintiff is entitled to 78 acres of the defendant's land being CIS MARA/NAIBOR AJIKJIK/175.
  • The defendant is ordered to transfer 78 acres of land to the plaintiff within 45 days; in default, the Deputy Registrar is empowered to effect the transfer.