[2023] KEHC 1365 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 1365 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfied all statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, including filing certified copies of the award and arbitration agreement. The application was unopposed, and there was no legal basis to refuse...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 1365 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kilimanjaro Construction Limited; Respondent: Cytonn Investment Partners Three LLP; Respondent: Cytonn Real Estate Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E1109 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award as Judgment
Outcome
application allowed; arbitral award recognized and adopted as judgment; decree and certificate of costs issued
Judges
A Mshila
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Recognition of Awards, Party to Party Costs, Interest on Awards
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitral Award Enforcement Recognition of Awards Party to Party Costs Interest on Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kilimanjaro Construction Limited

Applicant

Cytonn Investment Partners Three LLP

Respondent

Cytonn Real Estate Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral award dated July 21, 2021 should be adopted as the final judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether a decree should issue in terms of the arbitral award and a certificate of costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfied all statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, including filing certified copies of the award and arbitration agreement. The application was unopposed, and there was no legal basis to refuse recognition. The court held that the arbitral award should be recognized and adopted as the judgment of the court, and a decree should issue in terms of the award and the certificate of costs as determined by the arbitral tribunal. The court further affirmed that the award is final and binding, and that the applicant is entitled to the sums, interest, and costs as specified in...

Court Disposition

application allowed; arbitral award recognized and adopted as judgment; decree and certificate of costs issued

Orders

  • The arbitral award dated July 21, 2021 is recognized and adopted as a judgment of the court.
  • A decree issues in terms of the arbitral award and certificate of costs as determined by the arbitral tribunal.