Kimako & 7 others v Machakos County Government & 4 others (Environment and Land Petition E002 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 18418 (KLR) (18 December 2025) (Ruling)

Kimako & 7 others v Machakos County Government & 4 others (Environment and Land Petition E002 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 18418 (KLR) (18 December 2025) (Ruling)

The delay in filing the Replying Affidavit and documents may have been occasioned by both parties and the court; in the interest of justice and fair hearing, the documents are deemed duly filed and parties may recall witnesses if necessary. The application to strike out is not merited and is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 18418 (KLR)
Parties
1st Petitioner/applicant: Andrew Kiilu Kimako; 2nd Petitioner/applicant: Festus Ndote Kimako; 3rd Petitioner/applicant: Shedrack Mumo Paul; 4th Petitioner/applicant: Samuel Mulei Mutisya; 5th Petitioner/applicant: Benjamin Mukoma Mutisya; 6th Petitioner/applicant: Daniel Kioko Mutisya; 7th Petitioner/applicant: Caroline Mueni Mutisya; 8th Petitioner/applicant: Andrew Nzioki Kiilu; 1st Respondent: Machakos County Government; 2nd Respondent: National Environment Management Authority; 3rd Respondent: Maiko Nganda Ngunzu; 4th Respondent: Titus Kyalo Musyoka; 5th Respondent: Jeti General Contractors Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Petition E002 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Documents
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Striking Out Pleadings, Late Filing of Documents, Fair Trial, Court's Inherent Powers
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Environmental Law Striking Out Pleadings Late Filing of Documents Fair Trial Court's Inherent Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Kiilu Kimako

1st Petitioner/applicant

Festus Ndote Kimako

2nd Petitioner/applicant

Shedrack Mumo Paul

3rd Petitioner/applicant

Samuel Mulei Mutisya

4th Petitioner/applicant

Benjamin Mukoma Mutisya

5th Petitioner/applicant

Daniel Kioko Mutisya

6th Petitioner/applicant

Caroline Mueni Mutisya

7th Petitioner/applicant

Andrew Nzioki Kiilu

8th Petitioner/applicant

Machakos County Government

1st Respondent

National Environment Management Authority

2nd Respondent

Maiko Nganda Ngunzu

3rd Respondent

Titus Kyalo Musyoka

4th Respondent

Jeti General Contractors Limited

5th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Documents

  1. 1 Whether the Replying Affidavit and annexed documents filed by the 2nd Respondent should be struck out for being filed out of time without leave of court
  2. 2 Whether allowing the documents would prejudice the Petitioners and amount to unfair litigation tactics

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in filing the Replying Affidavit and documents may have been occasioned by both parties and the court; in the interest of justice and fair hearing, the documents are deemed duly filed and parties may recall witnesses if necessary. The application to strike out is not merited and is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The Replying Affidavit and documents by the 2nd Respondent are deemed duly filed
  • Parties at liberty to recall witnesses if need be