[2018] KEHC 10139 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 10139 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established that costs were taxed and certified at Kshs. 1,362,985.00, and that the respondents had not paid the amount despite demand. The court was satisfied that the respondents had been properly served through substituted service as authorized by the court. There being no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 10139 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kimani & Michuki Advocates; Respondent: Joseph Mwangi Gichungw’a; Respondent: Nancy Muthoni Gichungw’a; Respondent: Twin Oaks Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 126 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Taxation, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Taxation Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kimani & Michuki Advocates

Applicant

Joseph Mwangi Gichungw’a

Respondent

Nancy Muthoni Gichungw’a

Respondent

Twin Oaks Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether interest should be awarded on the taxed sum and from what date.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents were properly served with the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established that costs were taxed and certified at Kshs. 1,362,985.00, and that the respondents had not paid the amount despite demand. The court was satisfied that the respondents had been properly served through substituted service as authorized by the court. There being no opposition to the application, and no evidence that the certificate of taxation had been set aside or altered, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed sum. The court further held that interest would accrue at court rates from the date of the certificate of taxation until payment in full, rather than from the date of taxation as originally sought....

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the applicant for Kshs. 1,362,985.00 as taxed costs.
  • The sum of Kshs. 1,362,985.00 to attract interest at court rates from the date of the certificate of taxation until payment in full.