[2025] KEELC 436 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 436 (KLR)

The court held that the application could not be entertained because the applicant failed to serve the application on the advocate on record for the decree holder, as required by Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. The rule is designed to ensure that the advocate on record is either consenting to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 436 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Andrew Kimani; Respondent: Wanjiku Erikana Kimani
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 85 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Directions on Service of Application Post Judgment
Outcome
Directions issued; application to be served within 5 days or dismissed with costs.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Change of Advocate, Service of Process, Post Judgment Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Change of Advocate Service of Process Post Judgment Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Kimani

Applicant

Wanjiku Erikana Kimani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Directions on Service of Application Post Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the application can be entertained without service upon the advocate on record for the decree holder.
  2. 2 Whether leave of court to change advocate post-judgment can be granted without hearing the advocate on record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application could not be entertained because the applicant failed to serve the application on the advocate on record for the decree holder, as required by Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. The rule is designed to ensure that the advocate on record is either consenting to the change or is given an opportunity to be heard before leave is granted. Since service was not effected, the application is procedurally defective and cannot proceed until proper service is made. The court therefore directed that service be effected within five days, failing which the application would stand dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Directions issued; application to be served within 5 days or dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The firm of Kirera and Company Advocates to be served with the application within 5 days of these directions.
  • Failure to serve within 5 days will result in the application being dismissed with costs.