[2023] KEHC 26825 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 26825 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution and leave to appeal out of time was unopposed. The appellants demonstrated that the delay in filing the appeal was not inordinate and that they acted promptly upon discovering inconsistencies in the evidence. The court exercised its discretion to allow the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 26825 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Moses Kinuthia Kimani; Appellant: Munia Ahmed Basbass; Respondent: Makongo William Matinde
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E578 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed; stay of execution granted on condition; leave to appeal out of time granted.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Kinuthia Kimani

Appellant

Munia Ahmed Basbass

Appellant

Makongo William Matinde

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the appellants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment in Milimani CMCC E133389 of 2021.
  2. 2 Whether stay of execution pending appeal should be granted to prevent the decree from being executed before the appeal is heard.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in filing the appeal is excusable and not inordinate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay of execution and leave to appeal out of time was unopposed. The appellants demonstrated that the delay in filing the appeal was not inordinate and that they acted promptly upon discovering inconsistencies in the evidence. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application, granting stay of execution on condition that the entire decretal sum is deposited in court within 45 days, and directed the appellants to file the appeal within 30 days and prosecute it within 90 days. The court held that the interests of justice and equity favored granting the orders sought, especially as the respondent did not oppose the application and would not...

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed; stay of execution granted on condition; leave to appeal out of time granted.

Orders

  • Stay of execution pending appeal is granted on condition that the entire decretal sum is deposited in court within 45 days of this date.
  • The appellant to file the appeal within 30 days of this date.