[2025] KEBPRT 27 (KLR)

[2025] KEBPRT 27 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the tenant was in rent arrears of Kshs. 90,000, a claim that was unopposed and supported by affidavit evidence. The Tribunal held that the landlord was not entitled to an eviction order because no notice to terminate tenancy had been served as required by Section 4(2) of Cap 301. The Tribunal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEBPRT 27 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Kimani; Respondent: Lucy Njeri Muriithi
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E762 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Rent Arrears, Injunction, and Eviction
Outcome
Application allowed in part; rent arrears to be paid within 30 days; eviction and injunction orders declined; costs to landlord.
Judges
CN Mugambi
Legal Topics
Landlord Tenant Disputes, Rent Arrears, Eviction Procedure, Breach of Tenancy Agreement
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Landlord Tenant Disputes Rent Arrears Eviction Procedure Breach of Tenancy Agreement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kimani

Applicant

Lucy Njeri Muriithi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Rent Arrears, Injunction, and Eviction

  1. 1 Whether the tenant is in arrears of rent and liable to pay the outstanding sum.
  2. 2 Whether the tenant has breached the tenancy agreement by operating a bar or being a nuisance.
  3. 3 Whether the landlord is entitled to an eviction order without serving a notice to terminate tenancy as required by law.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the tenant was in rent arrears of Kshs. 90,000, a claim that was unopposed and supported by affidavit evidence. The Tribunal held that the landlord was not entitled to an eviction order because no notice to terminate tenancy had been served as required by Section 4(2) of Cap 301. The Tribunal also found that the lease agreement did not expressly prohibit the sale of alcohol or specify the manner of sale, and the evidence provided was insufficient to prove that the tenant had converted the premises into a bar or was a nuisance. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the tenant to clear the rent arrears within 30 days, failing which the landlord could levy distress for...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; rent arrears to be paid within 30 days; eviction and injunction orders declined; costs to landlord.

Orders

  • The tenant is to clear the rent arrears up to date within the next thirty (30) days of this ruling.
  • If the tenant fails to clear the rent arrears as ordered, the landlord will be at liberty to levy distress for the said rent with the assistance of a licensed auctioneer.