[2025] KEELRC 1590 (KLR)

[2025] KEELRC 1590 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is entitled to a refund of the Kshs.1,000,000 fine paid pursuant to the contempt order in Nairobi ELRC Cause No. 18 of 2016, as the Court of Appeal had set aside the order and expressly directed a refund if payment had been made. However, the court declined to grant the refund...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1590 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alex Kimanzi; Respondent: Dr Evans Mumo Mwangangi
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause E056 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Refund of Fine
Outcome
Application determined; refund not ordered in this cause; applicant directed to seek refund in original cause file; no order as to costs.
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Refund of Fine, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Contempt of Court Refund of Fine Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Kimanzi

Applicant

Dr Evans Mumo Mwangangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Refund of Fine

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a refund of the Kshs.1,000,000 fine paid pursuant to a contempt order that was subsequently set aside on appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for refund can be granted in a miscellaneous cause when the original cause file is available.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is entitled to a refund of the Kshs.1,000,000 fine paid pursuant to the contempt order in Nairobi ELRC Cause No. 18 of 2016, as the Court of Appeal had set aside the order and expressly directed a refund if payment had been made. However, the court declined to grant the refund order in the present miscellaneous cause because the original cause file (ELRC Cause No. 18 of 2016) was available and the proper procedure required the application for refund to be made in that file. The court directed the applicant to place a certified copy of the Court of Appeal judgment in the original file and to file an appropriate application there for the refund, thus...

Court Disposition

Application determined; refund not ordered in this cause; applicant directed to seek refund in original cause file; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The applicant shall forthwith place a certified copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment delivered on 3rd February, 2023 in Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 187 of 2017 in the court record/file in Cause No. 18 of 2016.
  • The applicant may file an appropriate application in Cause No. 18 of 2016 for issuance of an order for refund of the fine, possibly by the Deputy Registrar, upon verification of documents.