[2022] KEELC 13745 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 13745 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to file the substantive Notice of Motion within the time directed by the court, despite being granted leave and receiving further directions and reminders. In the absence of a substantive application on record, the court had no basis upon which to make a determination on...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 13745 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benjamin Gitere Kimari; Applicant: Hannah Ngina Kenneth Kimari (Administrators of the Estate of the Late Kenneth Kimani Kahura); Respondent: Land Registrar Nakuru Land Registry
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E3 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Preliminary/procedural Application
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; leave vacated; file closed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Procedure, Mandamus Orders, Land Registration Restrictions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Judicial Review Procedure Mandamus Orders Land Registration Restrictions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benjamin Gitere Kimari

Applicant

Hannah Ngina Kenneth Kimari (Administrators of the Estate of the Late Kenneth Kimani Kahura)

Applicant

Land Registrar Nakuru Land Registry

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Preliminary/procedural Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicants complied with the court's directions to file a substantive Notice of Motion within the stipulated period.
  2. 2 Whether the court could proceed to determine the matter in the absence of a substantive application on record.
  3. 3 Whether the leave previously granted should be vacated and the application dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to file the substantive Notice of Motion within the time directed by the court, despite being granted leave and receiving further directions and reminders. In the absence of a substantive application on record, the court had no basis upon which to make a determination on the merits of the case. Consequently, the court vacated the leave previously granted and dismissed the application, marking the file as closed. The decision was grounded in the procedural requirement that judicial review proceedings must be commenced by a substantive motion following the grant of leave, and failure to do so is fatal to the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of prosecution; leave vacated; file closed.

Orders

  • The leave granted pursuant to the chamber summons dated 18/3/2021 is hereby vacated and that application is hereby dismissed.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs of the proceedings.