[2010] KEHC 3291 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 3291 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in prosecuting the appeal was not due to the appellant's fault but rather the court's failure to provide the typed proceedings necessary for preparing the record of appeal. As such, the application to strike out the memorandum of appeal was dismissed. However, the appellant was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 3291 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kimilili Hauliers; Respondent: Esther Jemutai Kiasaina
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 108 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs; conditional timeline for appellant to act or appeal stands dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Striking Out, Delay in Prosecution, Record of Appeal Preparation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Striking Out Delay in Prosecution Record of Appeal Preparation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kimilili Hauliers

Appellant

Esther Jemutai Kiasaina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be struck out as an abuse of court process due to inaction by the appellant.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in prosecuting the appeal is attributable to the appellant or to the court's failure to supply proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in prosecuting the appeal was not due to the appellant's fault but rather the court's failure to provide the typed proceedings necessary for preparing the record of appeal. As such, the application to strike out the memorandum of appeal was dismissed. However, the appellant was directed to act promptly by requesting the proceedings from the Deputy Registrar and to set the appeal down for admission within three months, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed automatically.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs; conditional timeline for appellant to act or appeal stands dismissed

Orders

  • The application filed on 16th September 2009 is dismissed with costs.
  • The appellant must within three months from the date of this ruling prompt the Deputy Registrar to supply proceedings and set the appeal down for admission.