[2024] KECPT 1171 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1171 (KLR)

The tribunal found that there was no irregularity in the certificate of costs issued to the claimant. The amounts reflected in the decree did not specifically include the alleged lunch and bus fare, and there was no evidence of fraud or impropriety in the preparation or taxation of costs. The tribunal was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1171 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Petercott King'oo; Respondent: Boots Sacco
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 284 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Certificate of Costs and Stay Execution
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Costs Taxation, Stay of Execution, Certificate of Costs, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Costs Taxation Stay of Execution Certificate of Costs Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petercott King'oo

Applicant

Boots Sacco

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Certificate of Costs and Stay Execution

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of costs obtained by the claimant was fatally defective and should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the inclusion of bus fare and lunch in the certificate of costs was improper or fraudulent.
  3. 3 Whether execution should be stayed pending determination of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that there was no irregularity in the certificate of costs issued to the claimant. The amounts reflected in the decree did not specifically include the alleged lunch and bus fare, and there was no evidence of fraud or impropriety in the preparation or taxation of costs. The tribunal was not persuaded by the applicant's position and found no basis to set aside or amend the decree. The application was therefore dismissed with costs to the claimant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion Application dated 6th September, 2023 and filed on 14th September, 2023 is dismissed with costs.
  • 30 days leave to appeal is granted to the respondent.